Pages

Monday 21 November 2011

Museveni can avoid going like Gadaffi


American group shows how torturing Besigye could affect the President
At 25 years in power, Yoweri Museveni is the fifth longest president in Africa and pressure is mounting on him to quit.
In the latest salvo, a November 11 report by an American democracy analysis group, the African Centre for Strategic and International Studies (ACSS), criticises Museveni and other leaders who stay too long in power.
An article titled “Africa and the Arab Spring” in the report, A New Era of Democratic Expectations” the report warns that leaders who stay too long in power like Museveni “are likely to depart on terms considerably less favorable to themselves”.
The Arab spring - a wave of demonstrations and protests began on Dec. 18 2010 when young Tunisian Mohamed Bouazizi, set fire on himself in protest after police confiscated the fruit and vegetables he was selling from a street stall – have since seen the presidents of Ivory Coast, Tunisia, Egypt, and Libya, toppled.

Tunisia’s Ben Ali who had ruled his country for 23 years fled into exile; Egypt’s Hussein Mubarak is being prosecuted; and Libya’s Col. Muammar Gadaffi, who had ruled the country for 42 years, was killed by a mob in the street.
“The issues motivating public anger in the Arab world — restricted civil liberties, corruption, widening disparities in wealth, lack of dignity, police impunity, and sham elections — echo loudly in Africa,” the report says.
President Museveni has repeatedly said that what happened in Libya cannot happen in Uganda.
But the report warns that, “It would be dangerous for Museveni to infer from [any] structural differences that the risk of a Tunisia-like civil insurrection is impossible in Uganda….Persistent protests in Tunisia and Egypt began almost five years ago — and see where they ended.”
Opposition FDC Publicity Secretary, Wafula Oguttu, says Museveni might end up like Gadaffi or Mubarak.
“Ugandans will not sit back and watch one man drive the country to destruction,” he said.
Wafula added that Museveni is likely to stand again in 2016 for another five-year term. If that happens, then Museveni could easily become Africa’s longest serving president.
Museveni’s options
A fundamental question raised by the report is how other leaders like Museveni, who have stayed in power for long, are likely to end?
“Historically, autocratic leaders that proactively led the process of transition to democracy, fared considerably better than those that waited for the forces of change to overwhelm them,” the report says.
Authoritarian regimes that transitioned under pressure were unable to protect the institutional interests of their parties and the military.
“Instead they were more likely to be prosecuted for corruption or forced into exile,” the report says.
The report shows how semi-authoritarian leaders could conceivably lead transitions to democracy and win competitive elections like Jerry Rawlings did in Ghana. It says long-serving presidents like Museveni are “in a unique place to champion the creation of genuinely democratic institutions that they could leave as a legacy upon their departure from power”.
The analysts have developed a democratic trajectory basing on eight political, social, and economic indicators on whether a country moved to or away from democracy. The more positive the indicators, the more likely a country’s leader would end well.
President Museveni, for example, has only two positive indicators out of nine. He is rated well on economic growth and internet use.
He scores very badly on years in power and control of corruption and is only average on oppression of civil society and development progress, oil management and inflation.
By comparison, Rwanda’s Paul Kagame performs very badly on years in power, and suppression of civil society and the media, and control of inflation, and is average on internet use. He scores highly on economic growth, development progress, control of corruption, and lacking the threat of oil. Although the indicators are descriptive rather than predictive, basing on them, Kagame’s end is likely to be better than Museveni’s.
The report is based on research that covered about 50 African countries to analyse what it called the “big man syndrome” and rank countries on the extent to which they are democratising. Museveni’s regime is categorised as semi-autocratic, Kagame’s as autocratic, Kenya as a democratising regime and Ghana as a consolidating democracy.
In the non-democratic states, which are about 40 percent, the rulers depend on mineral wealth, politicise army and police, and personality-based government that refuse to share power.
“This neo-patrimonial model has ingrained the belief that politics is a winner-take-all endeavour,” the report says.
Effect of protests
“The Arab Spring is instigating changes in expectations that African citizens have of their governments,” the report says, “There is a palpable sense that African citizens will no longer passively sit back and accept abuses of power.”
It notes that there have been protests in more than a dozen African capitals, including Kampala, demanding greater political pluralism, transparency, and accountability following the launch of the Arab Spring.
It describes the large protests that erupted when television footage of the violent arrest of opposition leader, Kizza Besigye, was captured by Ugandan media and how broadcasters were forced to stop live coverage of the protests.
“More than anything Besigye could have said or done, the images capturing the government’s heavy-handed response badly damaged the legitimacy of the Museveni regime, both domestically and internationally,” the report says.
It commends Uganda’s parliament for its aggressive oversight role of the executive branch by subpoenaing government officials and documents, to review oil contracts that have been shrouded in secrecy and forcing ministers to step aside over corruption.
Uganda is listed among countries that could easily shift from semi-autocracy to democracy because of the growing assertiveness of its parliament, media, and local government structures.
“However, the decision by Yoweri Museveni to push forward with another term in March 2011, 25 years into his leadership tenure, as well as the expectation of new oil revenues in the near future is a counterweight to these democratic tendencies,” the report says.
“Uganda’s heavy-handed response to the service delivery protests organised by opposition politician Kizza Besigye did more to undermine the legitimacy of the government than the controversial 2011 presidential elections themselves,” the report says.
In a dramatic twist, the FDC says that in a bid to completely obliterate the opposition, the government has hatched plans to assassinate Besigye and other opposition leaders. The government has denied the allegations as “absurd and ridiculous”.
To promote positive regime change, the report recommends support for regional integration, planned transitions, rewarding positive leaders, and sanctioning regimes that use force against peaceful protesters.
“Such tools should target not only political leaders but also high-level military and police officers who enforce violent crackdowns against citizens expressing their rights to free speech,” it says.
It recommends that donors align aid with democratic practices to avoid the dilemma the United States and other leading donors currently face vis-a-vis their support for semi-authoritarian Ethiopia, Rwanda, and Uganda.
Already donors, under budgetary constraints themselves, have been cutting aid or putting African governments on notice for government repression and ongoing corruption in several countries, including Uganda.
The demand for democracy is propelled by expanding access to information, education, urbanisation, youthful populations, and the growing awareness of governance norms elsewhere.
The report comes just days after the US Department of State, which is the equivalent of the ministry of Foreign Affairs, on Nov. 2 issued a statement condemning Museveni’s failure to respect the freedoms of expression, assembly, and the media.
Earlier on Nov. 1, the London-based human rights group, Amnesty International, had issued a scathing indictment of the Museveni regime. The report described harassment and imprisonment of journalisms, torturing of opposition politicians, and denying protesters opportunity to assemble and express themselves.
Effect on economy
It pointed at widespread impunity of the security forces, killing of civilians, and detention of peaceful protesters on charges of treason.
The report notes that since 2000, autocratic governments in Africa have typically generated economic performance that is 40 percent slower than that of democracies.
According to the report slow growth removes a key pillar in rationalising autocratic governance — that they are more effective (what some have called “performance legitimacy”) and provide greater stability at the early stages of the development process.
“The longer leaders stay in power, the more likely their populations bear the cost,” it adds.
As a result of this growing unease of the populations and loss of support from key constituents for regime leaders, like the security, will drive forces of change against these regimes.
Uganda has a history of changing power violently. In 1966, the country’s first president, Sir Fredrick Mutesa II was ousted and exiled after a violent attack on the Buganda monarch. Milton Obote who ousted Mutesa was himself toppled in a coup in 1971, to return in 1980 and be overthrown in another military coup in July 1985. To become president, Museveni fought a bitter five-year guerrilla war that claimed thousands of lives.
Museveni is Africa’s fifth longest serving after Cameroon’s Paul Biya who has spent 28 years in power. Teodoro Obiang, of Equatorial Guinea is the longest serving followed by Angola’s Jose Edurdo dos Santos and Zimbabwe’s 87 year old Robert Mugabe who have ruled their countries for 32 years.
Besigye says Museveni does not have a succession plan.
“He cannot imagine himself out of power,” Besigye told The Independent. If President Museveni, under whose regime Uganda has witnessed unprecedented economic growth, presides over a peaceful transfer of power, he will have added another milestone.

Someone wants to kill me



Until May 23, Prof. Gilbert Balibaseka Bukenya was Uganda’s vice president. He spoke to The Independent about life after leaving the office he held for nine years.
Did your appointment as vice president the first time come as a surprise to you or did you expect it?
GB: No.  It was a surprise but I had anticipated it. You know I was a very junior member of the NRM party. I am not one of these people they call historical except that I was born in Kakiri and I always tell people to call me historical because the people of Kakiri were very crucial in starting the NRA war and I look after over 700 skulls of people that perished in the war. Anyway, I could see the president had tested me on many grounds to see whether I was suitable. I had noticed that especially when I was his minister of presidency.
Did the president call or consult you that he intended to make you vice president?
[Laughs] We discussed I think eight months before the appointment and we went through a lot of discussions. He would look at an issue and tell me I am preparing you for this. He even took a lot of my medical tests and he eventually rang me.  The president is a very interesting human being.
In the same breath did you discuss your removal from office?
[Silence then somber mood] No, he didn’t.  That upset me a bit because a day before the NRM members of parliament meeting, his secretary rang me and told me tomorrow the president is not nominating you and I said thank you very much. I knew he was telling me your time is over.
Were you disappointed at the manner of transmission of the message or were you disappointed that you had lost the position?
I had thought about this for nearly nine months.  I was not disappointed for losing the position but in the manner the message was transmitted - through a mere secretary yet we have been colleagues. I was expecting him to at least ring me and openly say “Bukenya thank you very much for working with me. I am sorry but I think it is time for a change” and I would have said thank you very much for giving me the opportunity to serve.  We eventually talked after I had been removed from office and we are moving on well.
Did you have in mind any people who would have replaced you as vice president in the event you were taken out of the position?
No. I never thought about it but certainly the current vice president was a very strong contender he had performed very well in parliament, supported the NRM positions and for me I was very pleased.
The President appointed Amama Mbabazi as prime minister but he also retains his position as NRM party secretary general.  Do you think the choice of prime minister was right? And do you think the prime minister should be secretary general of the party?
I think his appointment as prime minister is good. This man has been around with the President since 1974 so it is his time. He has learnt and has experience. He must know the operation of government since he has been with the president and knows the president.  We had a lot of discussion about the position of Secretary General. In one meeting it was agreed by CEC and NEC that a Secretary General should be allowed to work as Secretary General without participating in government. It was adopted. I don’t know why there is this silence about it now. I am no longer a member of CEC. I don’t want to dig deeper whether CEC has already discussed that. But I remember at that time even the president was interested in that separation. May be they have changed.
Your Excellency soon as you were relieved of your duties, the next thing was prosecution relating to management of funds during the organization of CHOGM.  Do you think that this prosecution is correct or indeed fair?
I was very surprised. I think it was hurriedly done. I don’t know whether the IGG wanted to show that he is now trying to catch the big fish because I don’t think it was done in fair way. I was chairman of the subcommittee who did not have any time to discuss or be involved in procurement. I never bought cars; the money came from the ministry of Finance to the central ministry of Foreign Affairs and it went straight to the relevant ministries to discuss how items would be procured. My job was simple; to guide this country on the way we were to run CHOGM. We would look at the money available and say because we have this amount of money we cannot buy 144 cars but we can hire them from those who have the cars and after using them, send them out. That was a policy issue.  Because the case is under courts of law I can’t discuss much about it. But I am very worried about the way things are turning out. For the last two months we have been asking the prosecutor to give us the file of what they are accusing us of so that we can ably defend ourselves. No single file has been given to us up today even when the magistrate said they should give us the files. I am getting worried not because of the case but the things that are beginning to take place in this case and also my life. I am a bit worried now about my life.
Could you be more elaborate and specific on that because this is a matter in court but you are raising an important matter of personal safety?
I don’t know whether there is another motive besides the case. I don’t know whether there is another person behind the case who wants to prolong my agony. There have been situations of associating me with political opposition and political people who are doing wrong to the government. When I was in court I was given bail and I was told to pay a bond of Shs 50 million cash. There are stupid allegations that this money was given to me by Kizza Besigye. It worries me because it is ISO (Internal Security Organisation) generated. That’s tainting my name because Dr. Besigye never gave me the money.
Are you friends with Dr. Kizza Besigye, do you meet often?
I have never met Besigye since 1999. That was the time he had this paper he was publishing complaining about the Movement. I am the one who passed this paper to the president and I subsequently called the caucus to discuss it. That was the only time I met Dr Besigye.  So I am worried about those things which are originating from ISO.
Why do you believe this is originating from ISO?
That is what I have been told. There is also another rumour that Bukenya is associating with underground movements against government and that he is mobilizing some people to cause commotion. They have been trying to search for my old friends. They have taken one lady to Serena and intimidated her to say that she was my secretary for CHOGM and that therefore she knows everything. That is absolute rubbish. They have intimidated her to say she has seen Bukenya talking to army people especially the Baganda officers; persuading her to give evidence. These are things that some people would be tried for treason.
Do you know if she was cooperative with them?
She was not. They attempted to give her money which she refused. I am worried about her because they may kill her.
Did she report these happenings to you?
Yes.
So she is the source of your information?
She is just one source. There are other sources. I am bringing this out because I left Uganda during Amin’s time as there were unnecessary killings of human beings, unnecessary intimidation, false allegations about people which would lead to death of some people. Now I am fearful of this beginning to happen in our country. I am worried of people who try to bring false accusations about others to bring them down. I don’t think we should again have other extrajudicial processes that President Museveni has fought so hard to get rid of.
This is a very serious allegation that you are making. Do you know  any persons that might be behind them?
I don’t know. That’s why I am in confusion. The president of the country stands up and says Bukenya is not guilty of the CHOGM cases citing his consultation with the Attorney General. And then there is insistence in spite of the fountain of honour saying so. This is not the first time the president is saying so. I remember during the Temangalo issue, the president said Hon. Mbabazi is not guilty. All he can do is apologize and the matter is closed. This one has refused to come to a close. What is inside it? So I am beginning to fear.
The Independent is reliably informed that the Attorney General and Vice President Edward Ssekandi were directed by the President to meet IGG Raphael Baku to drop the charges against you following a legal opinion by the AG that the case against you had no legal ground but the IGG  did not honour the directive and slapped more charges against you.  What would you describe the behavior of Mr. Baku as?
It is surprising because every country has the fountain of honour and whether the judiciary goes ahead to prosecute, the fountain of honour will one day exercise his prerogative of mercy. That is why I am worried and asking what’s happening. Where really is the problem? When I hear operatives intimidating people to testify against me I get worried. When my lawyers ask for files to build their defence, and they can’t get them, what is happening? That’s why I fear even for my life. But I have always said Bukenya will die in Uganda. I will not go back in exile. One person even called me anonymously and said “we shall put holes in your body”. That makes me fear that my life is in danger.
Did you advise this lady to report the matter to police?
We are doing that.
Have you reported what you call threats to your personal security to the police?
I am studying them quietly first.
The president has said in the NRM caucus that you are not guilty of the offences you are being accused of. Would you and your legal team consider calling him to testify in court?
I don’t think that it is necessary. I have instructed my lawyers to technically continue representing me in the case. If it is necessary, let’s see action. I am not frightened to go to a court of law because I am not guilty. I am appealing for judicial freedom.
You have an election petition in the High Court whose judgment has been postponed. Are you confident you will win this case?
I can’t be confident. But I have been to court and seen how that judge has been conducting court during the hearings and I think the judge is independent. Whatever decision he will make independently, without anybody ringing him, I will accept.
Looking back, in your years of service  to this nation, what would you say I wish I hadn’t done that or I wish I had done this?
I wish could have put in more effort in trying to really remove poverty. I came out of a very poor family to become a very rich man and I hate poverty. But I don’t think I have done enough. Towards my removal as vice president I was beginning on a new programme of millennium villages, a new concept of building so that people live together, have piped water, a good sewer system, and then they go out into their gardens to dig just like it is being done everywhere in the world. I wish I had started on that three years earlier.
Any regrets?
I socialize a lot. I enjoy life. As I do this some small people have taken advantage of that. Let me finally say I have not risen and coming down as one newspaper said. The rise and fall of Bukenya is not yet. I am still rising because political rising is not associated with political appointments. My fall from vice presidency was a fall from a political appointment. My fall from political function as a member of parliament is not yet even if the judge says otherwise in the election petition. I would still go and contest in Busiro North and defeat anyone who will stand against me.
In your political life are there people you wish you could say to, I am sorry I wronged you?
None. I have not been stepping on anybody’s toes.
Are there those you would wish they looked you in the eye and said ,sorry I wronged you Bukenya?
The ones who went and told President Museveni in my presence a lie; that I was mobilizing to overthrow the president. That man and woman will die guilty of a very big offence. If these came and said forget it I would be the happiest man in the world.
Are  you comfortable naming them?
They will know themselves if they read your paper.

http://www.independent.co.ug/cover-story/4749-someone-wants-to-kill-me-part-ii

Can Museven defend all his company members





Defending the Prime Minister may have left Museveni with a narrowing circle of allies. Is he worth it?
NRM members unhappy with the way their chairman and secretary general are running the party voice one common grudge: their “leader is surrounded”.
Ruling party members say that President Yoweri Museveni is increasingly listening to only one voice - that of Prime Minister Amama Mbabazi.
Ironically, as anti-Mbabazi voices grow in number and pitch, his star seems only to rise. Reports last week that the President had ceded to him powers over all the Ministers in his [President’s] office – on top of his control of most government activity as Leader of Government Business – indicate a precedent that gives Mbabazi more muscle than any of his predecessors under the current regime.
For whatever reasons the President trusts Mbabazi – whether it’s because he’s strong, weak, smart, organised, sober, whatever - it should be natural that a head of state would step up to defend a man who is such a vital part of his operation, especially if he feels he’s being unfairly accused.

But the President’s protection of his Prime Minister has not come without a price. Many trusted allies – within and outside Parliament - appear to have retreated from the “inner circle”, reluctant to work with Mbabazi. As demonstrated over recent weeks, many party members – especially in Parliament – do not want to listen to him. It may be only a matter of time before such disaffection percolates into the lower ranks of the party. Some say the President is stubbornly alienating the party for Mbabazi’s sake and that in the not-too-far future, he may find the price to this sacrifice to be too high for the prize.
Among the disenchanted, The Independent has learnt, is the President’s brother, bush-war hero Gen. Caleb Akandwanaho aka Salim Saleh, who many see as a galvanising factor within the ruling party.
As a former Minister of State for Microfinance (2006- 2009) , former Army Commander (1987-89), Member of Parliament, businessman, and more importantly as the President’s brother, Saleh is said to have a substantial appeal in the NRM - among its historical and latter-day members,  its civilian and armed cadres, its radicals and ‘rebels’, alike. Until recently, he was also reported to have the President’s ear.
Sources say Saleh had been gearing up for a return to cabinet in May, but changed his mind when he learned that Mbabazi would be heading that team as prime minister. Saleh reportedly protested to his brother - in Mbabazi’s presence - that his choice of prime minister had proved divisive in the party and his becoming premier would worsen conflicts at a time when the NRM needed consolidation.
Museveni refused to reconsider, it is said. Saleh withdrew his interest in cabinet, and returned to his Garuga home, where he spends most of his time overseeing his businesses - including farming interests in Nakaseke and Arua. That is also where he sits to proclaim he has no interest in the on-going shenanigans in the NRM.
Saleh’s disengagement might be a relief to Museveni compared to the more vindictive paths other NRM members have taken. Sources have told The Independent that even out of the ubiquitous eye of the cameras in Parliament, party members in the army had become more outspoken, making a habit of talking to Museveni about the danger of his overstaying in power, arguing for the need to organise an orderly transition. The President reportedly got tired of that talk and ordered them to stop it.
A spoke in the wheel
At the recent Kyankwanzi retreat, when some MPs walked out on the President Museveni as he attempted to hand running of the show over to Mbabazi, Kampala Central’s Muhammad Nsereko engaged his party chairman in a bitter altercation.
The last time a similar confrontation was reported was in 2003, when former Local Government Minister, now PPP President Jaberi Bidandi Ssali, opposed the lifting of presidential term limits.
At the time, Museveni reportedly asked one of his king-pin ministers; “Who are you? You are just a spoke in the wheel. You can go.” Which he did. When the next cabinet reshuffle was announced, Bidandi and like-minded ministers including Museveni’s childhood friend Eriya Kategaya, Miria Matembe and Sarah Kiyingi, had been thrown out.
Perhaps wary of a similar fall-out, most other historical allies of the President have kept their peace as the drama in Parliament has unfolded.
Sources say that some of them – now in Mbabazi’s shadow - are understood to have sponsored ‘rebel’ MPs, whom they keep urging to pressure the party leadership to reform, or more precisely, to throw out the prime minister.
Reasons for hating Mbabazi appear to be as many as the diversity of NRM’s membership, but one oft-quoted has been his tendency to actively alienate others from the President.
In an interview with The Independent a month ago, former vice president Gilbert Bukenya said a “senior leader of the NRM told the president a lie” that Bukenya was mobilising his own support to become president. That “senior leader”, The Independent has established, was Mbabazi. Bukenya said that despite his efforts to correct the impression, Museveni seemed to have believed “the lie” because he minimised contact with his deputy from that time, later dumping him and setting after him the dogs of the IGG’s office.
Even after leaving vice president’s office, sources say Mbabazi has continued to witch-hunt Bukenya, and his indictment before the Anti Corruption Court was understood to be the handiwork of the prime minister. Museveni’s protestations that Bukenya had no case to answer even as the trial proceeded appear to suggest that the President was helpless in the matter.
As helpless as he appears to be in his defence of the Prime Minister? The irony of the President’s defence of Mbabazi is that while it shows the Prime Minister’s clout as growing, it depicts the President’s as somewhat diminishing. Not only because he has had such a hard time shoring up the support of his own party, his cajoling and threatening apparently not as effective as it used to be, but also because the dissenters appear to be too many and diverse, and too invested to back off.
But the President is also keenly invested in protecting Mbabazi. When opposition MPs chorused “Temangalo”- in reference to the controversial land deal in which the Prime Minister sold land to the National Social Security Fund at Shs 11 billion - as they heckled Mbabazi during Museveni’s State of the Nation Address in June, Museveni defended the Prime Minister. He argued that his man was not corrupt, and stories were being made up by his detractors. “If any of you had lasted as long as he has lasted, that would be a good achievement,” he told them, a veiled reference to a history in the NRM of many opposition MPs.
Counter-accusing a whole range of detractors appears to have become Museveni’s default defence of the Prime Minister:
“Baryomunsi is fighting Mbabazi’s wife, while Niwagaba is fighting battles on behalf of Father Gaetano [Tibayenda] against Hope Mwesigye [former Agriculture Minister and sister-in-law to Mbabazi, [MP] Sekikubo is fighting Foreign Affairs Minister Sam Kutesa...,” the President reportedly  told the NRM Caucus at the retreat in Kyankwanzi.
Following the port-retreat confusion in Parliament - during which NRM members were unable or unwilling to withdraw the resolution demanding that the prime minister and ministers Sam Kuteesa and Hillary Onek step aside to allow an investigation of the oil contract affairs, including allegations that they had taken oil bribes - the President attempted to mend fences between the Speaker of Parliament Rebecca Kadaga and Mbabazi. Summoning the duo to State House, where Museveni made no secret of his intention to stick with Mbabazi and not ask him to step aside. Not much is known of the details of that discussion, but Kadaga, who was still awaiting a presidential response to the resolution, returned to parliament appearing to have washed her hands of the resolution and all that it represented.
While an ad hoc parliamentary committee, chaired by former Minister of state for Transport and chairperson of the Natural Resources Committee, Michael Werikhe, has been appointed to investigate the allegations, not much confidence is invested in its outcomes.
“The findings of the investigation have already been predetermined [in Mbabazi’s favour],” said the dispirited Lwemiyaga County MP Theodore Sekikubo, who was a lead petitioner in the recall of parliament for the special sitting. Part of the pessimism is because aside its chair – a former minister who some fear may use the committee to climb back into his cushy cabinet post - the  seven-member committee also has Mbabazi’s ally and mentee Steven Tashobya and three unknowns. The two rays of hope, opposition politicians Hussein Kyanjo and Cecilia Ogwal, may find themselves outnumbered and outmanoeuvred.
Lone disciple?
NRM’s vice chairman for Eastern Uganda and Soroti Municipality MP, Mike Mukula, says that in the course of his long 25-year rule, Museveni has realised that not many people can agree with him all the time, which explains his “deep attachment to Mbabazi”.
Mukula said it is unfortunate that the public has a different perception and great dislike for a man that the president has immense faith in.
Over the past quarter century, Museveni has showed himself to treasure loyalty as much as he loathes challenge.
When a retired army captain, Ruhinda Maguru, declared his ambition to challenge Museveni for the leadership of the NRM in the run-up to the 2011 election, the NRM’s vetting committee, under Mbabazi’s stewardship, ignored him and declared Museveni unchallenged. Maguru threatened court action in vain.
A similar fate befell Dokolo County MP, Felix Okot-Ogong, who is believed to have lost his place in cabinet as State Minister for Youth and Child Affairs because he declared a desire – however unlikely - to succeed Museveni.
Another former minister and bush war fighter, Col. Tom Butime, lost his Mwenge North constituency in the last election because, observers say, he rejected a post as state minister for Karamoja Affairs in 2006, which he saw as a demotion, coming down from a full Minister-ship of Internal Affairs.
Butime was lambasted by the army and defence spokesperson Lt. Col. Felix Kulaigye for “insubordination”. The moment the commander-in-chief deploys a soldier, argued Kulaigye, the soldier must comply without questions.
What Mbabazi has, that others lack, observers say, is a keen understanding of what his boss wants. “Mbabazi always positions himself as seeking to work for the president, not to be president,” an NRM insider said.
By declaring war against the dissenting MPs, Museveni may be taking on virtually everyone who matters within the NRM, except Mbabazi. This is especially as, at an age just shy of seventy, they don’t take seriously his threats to return to the bush against them, or to rule forever. Moreover, some MPs like Kampala Central’s Nsereko may be encouraged by the fact that even NRM voters in their constituencies want to see reforms in the party.
That Mbabazi is Museveni’s closest ally in government is instructive. The Kinkinzi West MP has attributes Museveni is always happy to publicly celebrate – loyal, hardworking, sober; with no time to spend in bars and other social places where he might spill state or party secrets. Mbabazi reinforces this image. One of his favourise retorts are; “I have a lot of work to do”.
Ironically, it is for these qualities that many of Mbabazi’s detractors do not want him in charge, as they perceive him to look down upon the mass, grass-root origins of the party in the jungles of Luwero, on which they rely for their political strength.
Bush-war base
While Mbabazi was an active player in the liberation war, he worked far from the jungles, in the external wing, helping to mobilise resources and support for the war effort. On taking power in 1986, he served as Director General of the External Security Organization (ESO) until 1991, participated in writing the 1995 Constitution, and started his ascent through different ministerial portfolios to become premier.
It is a tribute to his discipline that as Museveni’s view of many of his colleagues has waned over the years, his view of Mbabazi has only improved.
Of the 41 Ministers Museveni named to his first cabinet in 1986, only five remain –Ruhakana Rugunda, Kahinda Otafiire, Crispus Kiyonga, Moses Ali and Eriya Kategaya. Although at senior cabinet level, none of them remains as influential in government as Mbabazi.
During the bush war, there was always friction between the field combatants and members of the external wing, but special dislike seems to have been reserved for Mbabazi.
Maj. Gen. Pecos Kutesa, in a 2006 book titled “Uganda’s Revolution 1979-1986: How I saw it” even questions Mbabazi’s bush-was credentials. Kutesa narrates a visit to Nairobi for the 1985 peace talks, during which he was astounded by Mbabazi’s lifestyle.
“I looked at Mbabazi wearing an expensive suit and driving a posh car and wondered whether we were fighting the same war,” wrote Kutesa.
But Mbabazi’s penchant for sharp suits and posh cars, in Museveni’s view, is a lesser evil compared to the drinking and womanising of many of the other cadres.
When Maj. Gen. Kahinda Otafiire and former Vice President Gilbert Bukenya challenged Mbabazi for the party’s secretary general-ship, Museveni remarked to NRM members that they needed a secretary general who wouldn’t drink and spill party secrets in bars.
When Kizza Besigye first challenged Museveni in 2001, Mbabazi famously declared that Besigye had “jumped the queue”. While some NRM leaders say they may consider running for president when Museveni retires, Mbabazi says he has no presidential ambition and he will retire when Museveni retires. Museveni may not believe him, but he is happy that Mbabazi is sending a good example to quell ambition in the party.
Observers expect Museveni to stick with Mbabazi because he seems unable to spot cadres who suit his approach. The rare competition to Mbabazi, paradoxically despite his love for the bottle, was Brig. Noble Mayombo, who unfortunately died young. Like Mbabazi, insiders say Museveni treasured Mayombo for his combination of hard work and constructive – but cautious - advice, given with due care not to push his boss’ positions too much.
Another cadre groomed in the stable of the NRM, whom Museveni once considered a viable successor in the party, observers say, was former Army Commander Maj. Gen. Mugisha Muntu, who unfortunately defected to the opposition FDC, where he is now organising secretary, along with his former bush war colleague and Museveni’s former doctor, Kizza Besigye.
Muntu says there is a problem with Museveni’s management style. “When a leader prefers control to delegation of powers,” says Muntu, “that is how things end up [in failure to trust the people the works with].”
Muntu says his former boss had fallen out with a lot of people over time and if he lost the loyalty of “those few he has identified he knows his position will probably be much more threatened than it is already”.
Muntu, who is said to have declined a cabinet posting on quitting the army in 1998, says he is now most concerned with how Uganda will be managed after Museveni. This echoes Besigye’s stand. The FDC leader insists on “walking to work”, a move widely seen as meant to mobilise civil disobedience against Museveni.
Besigye had been critical of Museveni’s rule as early as the Constituent Assembly when he represented the army, but it was his damning 1999 dossier, “An Insider’s view of how the Movement lost the broad base” that broke the proverbial camel’s back.
Besigye depicted his boss as a manipulator, fixated on staying in power against all odds. Referring to a letter Museveni wrote to a group of CA delegates, Besigye showed that Museveni urged them to retain the Movement System as opposed to reintroducing the multiparty system since it was a convenient vehicle to retain power.
And retaining power is what Mbabazi seems to help Museveni do. Makerere University political scientist, Yasin Olum, thinks there must be something beyond just trusting Mbabazi that others don’t see. Otherwise, wonders Olum, “why would Museveni put his career on the line because of him?”
The answer for the above question may elude us for now, but political historians cannot believe their luck. Documenting how an ageing president who shot to power with revolutionary ideas and a “broad based” government, dealt with a stumbling economy and a god-sent oil find, amidst deepening opposition and a thinning coterie of friends and allies, is the stuff that future careers will be made of.

Profile of Parlaiment’s investigators
Speaker of Parliament, Rebecca Kadaga, on Oct.27 institutes an ad hoc committee to investigate the allegations of corruption, bribery and other wrongdoing, involved in the management of the initial stage of Uganda’s oil. Key of these allegations is that three ministers – Prime Minister Amama Mbabazi, Foreign Affairs Minister Sam Kutesa and former Minister of Energy (now Minister of Internal Affairs) Hillary Onek – had eaten bribes from the oil company Tullow Oil, to favour its concession to exploit Uganda’s oil. While President Museveni appears to have ignored a Parliamentary resolution asking the ministers to step aside and allow an investigation, Parliament’s committee will proceed. However, given the frantic political lobbying, including a week-long NRM retreat that followed the resolution, and the fact that the senior ministers are in position to influence the work of the committee, many advocates have lost any faith that the committee could produce valid outcomes. But objective observers might want to give the committee the benefit of a doubt:
Michael Werikhe Kafabusa
The committee chairman, MP for Bunghoko South, was a state minister for Housing in the previous cabinet till he was dropped from cabinet in the May cabinet reshuffle. Werikhe also served as state minister for Energy for one year from 2005-2006 and before that, state minister for trade in 1999. Critics are concerned that as a staunch NRM cadre with clear ambitions to return to the fold of cabinet – given the amount of trouble he allegedly has been giving Nandala Mafabi in Eastern Uganda – he may use the investigation as an opportunity to win back the favours of the President and his Prime Minister.
He may have the general competence to carry the investigation, having worked as a Social Sciences lecturer in Makerere University and an acting commissioner in the department of physical planning, Ministry of Lands, Housing and Urban Development until 1996, some worry that his political ambitions may over-ride his ethics.
Stephen Tashobya
The MP for Kajara County, Ntungamo district, came to parliament in 2006 on an NRM ticket. Tashobya also chairs the Legal and Parliamentary Affairs committee of Parliament, so his presence on the committee has technical legitimacy. But Tashobya,  a partner with Tashobya, Byarugaba and co. advocates, is seen by some a Mbabazi-lackey. He was reported to have used the NRM’s Kyankwazi retreat to lobby for support for the Prime Minister, convincing with other NRM members to withdraw their consent on the resolutions once they returned to Parliament. Many see his presence on the committee as intended solely to defeat its very purpose.
Hussein Kyanjo
The Makindye East Member of Parliament, also leader of the Justice Forum (JEEMA) party is one of only two opposition MPs on the committee. He has reportedly already been to Dubai, Malta and the UK, investigating the documents that allegedly implicate the ministers in corruption. He can also quite ably carry his own in a hostile committee, and supporters of the resolution will hope that he does.
Bigirwa Julius Junjura
The MP for Buhaguzi County, Junjura is a member of the natural resources and budget committees of Parliament and a member of the NRM Party. He’s largely an unknown quantity, but to observer, his party affiliation pre-determines where his loyalties will lie.
Cecilia Ogwal
The MP for Dokolo County is the other opposition voice on the committee. Formerly known as the Iron Lady of the UPC, the veteran MP crossed to the FDC Party in 2010. Thankfully she did not lose her iron will and supporters of the resolution will hope that she can use it to drive the investigation. Almost an institution unto herself, Ogwal has been a constant staple of Uganda’s Parliament since the Constituent Assembly in the early 1990s. She is currently Uganda’s representative in the Pan-African Parliament in Durban South Africa. She reportedly turned down a ministerial offer by President Museveni. This offers some hope that in addition to her broad experience, the MP has a backbone that can serve her well as she navigates the politics of the committee.
Grace Freedom Kwiyucwincy
The Zombo District Woman representative is an NRM member, but has not yet distinguished herself in Parliament since her term began after the February general elections. A member of the committee on public service and local government, she served for three years as a technical adviser in Ministry of Local Government. Her party leanings might suggest that she pulls for the ministers, but in this day of rebels in the ruling party, it may be best to wait and see.
Joseph Matte
The Bughendera County MP is an NRM-leaning Independent legislator on his second term in Parliament. Pro-resolutionists hope that his poor treatment at the NRM primaries where he lost might help him carry a grudge into the investigation, but observation of ‘formerly NRM’ Independents suggests that their allegiance to the mother party more often than not, tends to win out.

http://www.independent.co.ug/cover-story/4839-isolated

Tuesday 30 August 2011

Museveni attacks West over Libya

                                           Dictators Museveni (L) and Gadaffi (R)

Entebbe
President Museveni has reiterated his criticism of the West and attacked Nato for disorganising a friend, whose 42-year rule faces a humbling end.
Speaking at the annual Muslims Iftar dinner at State House, Entebbe on Saturday, Mr Museveni addressed himself on two fundamental issues: The economic crisis at home and the battle for Libya. He accused the West of greed and defended Col. Gaddafi’s mistakes even though, he said, the Libyan leader attempted to go behind his back to hijack his chiefs in Kampala.
“Gaddafi had his own mistakes, he came here and organised my chiefs without telling me. We cancelled that meeting and I warned chiefs because it was wrong,” Mr Museveni said. “But Gaddafi built a mosque for us and as a leader, he had his mistakes, but those Europeans have more mistakes and problems. They think the rest of us are fools except themselves. When there are riots in Africa, they call them pro-democracy and in London, they call them, criminals.”
Mabira talk
Although, Mufti Ramadhan Mubajje had questioned the proposal to give away part of Mabira Forest to Mehta Group to grow more sugarcane, the President brushed off the matter that has caused apprehension in the country under the carpet.
Offering a sneak-peek into the decision of last week’s African Union meeting in Addis Ababa, Ethiopia, Mr Museveni said: “Those Europeans should know that Africa of today is not Africa of 100 years ago or even 50 years ago. Yesterday (Friday), we had a meeting and Africa is taking a decision to defend Africa’s independence. We want dialogue in Libya and we want a cessation of hostilities.”
President Museveni, however, said the war in Libya took the African Union by Surprise but promised the organisation, that has refused to recognise the rebel would work to resolve the conflict in Libya peacefully. “It took us by surprise but we are going to sort it out.”
The African Union has not recognised the National Transition Council, although individual members such as Egypt, Senegal, Nigeria, Tunisia and Burkina Faso have done so.

http://www.monitor.co.ug/News/National/-/688334/1227042/-/bjtih6z/-/index.html

Tuesday 23 August 2011

Museveni Next After Gaddafi – Mbabazi


By Our Reporters

When Libya is a done deal, Uganda will be ripe for ‘Tomahawk’ bombing menu by Western forces led by the United States, a dossier penned by an NRM insider reveals.
Nina Mbabazi,  daughter to powerful  security Minister Amama Mbabazi claims to have busted several secret agents of the west exchanging notes at Kampala’s expensive hotels on  how Uganda is the best air cargo hub that needs conquering.
“Since 2006, I have chanced upon many British, Americans and Chinese at Serena, Sheraton, etc who have been talking about Uganda as an air cargo hub.
They are ready to build huge air cargo cities outside Kampala,” Mbabazi explains in her dossier which she sent to intelligence agencies that her dad coincidentally heads.
In a thrilling dossier, Mbabazi claims that America’s spy body CIA has crafted a plan of mobilising Ugandans beginning with the upper class via the internet.She explains that it has worked with Ugandans in the diaspora who are ranting and asking nationals to get rid of the NRM government at all costs.
She reveals that the west would not use Museveni’s long stay in power as a rallying point, but rather create an economy of scarcity.In so doing the starving populace will be reminded about the long years of NRM rule and thereby call for Museveni’s exit.“The price of rice has risen from 1,800 to 2,500 per kg.
Almost close to imported basmati rice. I wonder, hasn’t matooke taken a big banana wilt beating and now the high fuel prices have pushed up a bunch to 15,000. Do you remember a few years ago when we spent 7,000 a bunch? What about potatoes, all food.
Is it not true that Uganda’s working class is living off one meal a day? Has anyone seen the transformation at city square at night?”She adds “If you haven’t, please drive and park and see how many people leave their offices in the evening and have a kikomando as their only meal.
What they earn, they leave for their children to at least have a cup of beans for food for the day.
These are all the effects of economic hit men and Uganda can’t do anything about it unless they start to recognise the signs.“This is what causes revolutions that don’t have leaders, they think they don’t have leaders but most times the psychology is the same creating one mindset,” Mbabazi who played a big role in Museveni’s 4th term warns in the two page dossier that was published on her blog on Thursday.
Nina, who is also the chairperson of Kanungu District NRM Youth league has of recent become a critic of the regime her father is serving and has on several for warned of the consequences of  the revolutions that are sweeping across the Arab world .
We have also confirmed that Nina has drawn attention to the intelligence services through her constant criticisms aired on certain blogs.A source said, “Intelligence wants to establish why she has of recent become so rhetorical of the regime,” a source said.
Nina’s comments come a few days after the son-in-law to president had called on him, urging him to start grooming a successor.In a two page dossier published in this newspaper, Banabas Taremwa said Museveni should look for a successor for the sake of continuity and stability within the NRM and the country at large.

BELOW IS THE VERBATIM OF MBABAZI’S DOSSIER
The US and other Western powers have been helped by our ceding rights to government one right at a time and being comfortable with it.
Now the African governments need us to survive and this is in fact the strongest position the citizens of Africa will ever be in. We should talk our intellectual debates off the laptops and actually engage.I have no doubt that Uganda is next.
Not because NRM has overseen Uganda for 25 years but because we are strategically located for world trade and we have oil. It has been an open secret that the US and China have all been looking at African countries that would best suit the air cargo needs of the future.
The Somali pirates have brought that point home to these people that soon, they must move to air cargo and get off the waters. It speeds up world trade and it reduces insurance loses that are in billions.
Also with the ongoing weather changes, we are likely to see more Tsunami’s more unstable weather so air is a safe bet.Since 2006, I have chanced upon many British, Americans and Chinese at Serena, Sheraton, etc who have been talking about Uganda as an air cargo hub. They are ready to build huge air cargo cities outside Kampala.
One program they were targetting was Rakai but it got entangled in religious bickering. But they are looking at Rakai, Ntungamo, Soroti and Gulu as air cargo hubs.
There are huge Macau casino investors that are also willing to come and I personally met with the Italian Formula 1 team that is interested in Uganda now as their new site outside the Arab world. Uganda is situated in the best place.
People, we are the heart of Africa! Take Uganda and you have conquered the African world from Sudan to Libya, Congo to Nigeria, Uganda to Ethiopia, Uganda to South Africa.Uganda is a sweet cookie for all these people and now we also seem like oil shall be added in the package by 2015.
China’s CNOOC would not have paid Tullow so much (which they are trying to shirk taxes for) if they didn’t see Uganda as more than oil.We are the land of honey and milk right now. So anything that they think will give them excuse to step in, they will take it.
Forget about the morality here. They know that in Africa if you say there is a dictatorship with anyone who has been in power for 25 years, all of us Africans will just say yes and make noise and wait for someone else to come do the dirty job.
They are your shoulder to cry on, they are BIG BROTHER.Look at some Ugandans who are openly asking for assistance to get rid of NRM. These are the people they want to hear from. You are the ones who will lead us to second colonisation.
But when someone writes here that a government has become so disconnected that they have nothing to live for, then a serious government will take note and try to build bridges.
I was watching Al Jazeera last week and they run a story saying CIA has increased its budget for Twitter and Facebook and has designed software that will allow an agent to manage ten accounts with one ID but all ten showing up with different names.
So you will think that all of a sudden many people are with you and you shall gain the courage to come out for peaceful demonstrations. They know that you will not come out for Kizza Besigye, but they know that if they touch upon something that is within your self interest and NOT political interest, you shall rise.
So what do they expect? If you remember the Asian tigers and how they had chased away IMF and World Bank, do you recall what happened there? Their money lost value so quickly. Indonesia under Suharto the dollar in a period of 3 months went from $1=2,500 to $1= 10,000. Income remained constant and you can read about all the other economic triggers.
To add insult to injury, Suharto increased taxes for the rich but excluded members of his family who were classified as super rich. It took Suharto 6 months to fall and in the rest of the countries, instability took 6-12 months. These are economic hitmen.
And the IMF is back in full force in the Asian Tigers.In Tanzania, Nyerere was not going to give up power when he did, but after hunger and starvation, he bowed out feeling like a total failure. If you haven’t already been informed, WFP has doubled their budget for your maize, your staple food.
The budget is now $100M. Most of our population Bank of Uganda says 75% do not keep their money in formal banks. They hide it under their beds or in informal sectors so we can’t tap it to increse investment yet now WFP is targetting those as their suppliers.
WFP is building warehouses upcountry under the guise of efficiency but in reality, they always give the lowest maize price. They are going to mop up all your maize and send it as relief to Sudan and Kenya and other countries that are suffering.
We Kampala people who eat porridge and posho, the cost of food will go up, but your incomes will remain the same. Hunger and starvation will set in and that is when your self interest shall kick in.Look at the knock on effects of lack of maize. In Kanungu our villagers are reaping the benefits.
The price of rice has risen from 1,800 to 2,500 per kg. Almost close to imported basmati rice. I wonder, hasn’t matooke taken a big banana wilt beating and now the high fuel prices have pushed up a bunch to 15,000. Do you remember a few years ago when we spent 7,000 a bunch? What about potatoes, all food.
Is it not true that Uganda’s working class is living off one meal a day? Has anyone seen the transformation at city square at night? If you haven’t please drive and park and see how many people leave their offices in the evening and have a kikomando as their only meal.
What they earn, they leave for their children to at least have a cup of beans for food for the day. These are all the effects of economic hit men and Uganda can’t do anything about it unless they start to recognise the signs.

REVOLUTIONS WITHOUT LEADERS
This is what causes revolutions that don’t have leaders, they think they don’t have leaders but most times the psychology is the same creating one mindset. The mindset is the leader.
In Egypt they are wise but will take a long time to recover. They pelted El Baradei with stones and he couldn’t vote in the referendum. What the referendum showed, is that Africans don’t care which dictator is in power, they shall move on when the new dictator comes and they shall do so with gladness in their hearts.
Case in point Egypt elections December 2010 = 7million voters. Egypt Referendum March 2011 = 14million voters.So Uganda, Congo, Zimbabwe, etc. Our leaders are sitting ducks.
Only the citizenry can save their countries from re-colonization because leaders are generally much unfocused on what is the citizenry’s “self-interest”. This is why unless they connect with you, shall fall like a pack of cards, and Africa won’t skip a heartbeat.
It shall move on and the air cargo terminals shall be built and we shall all enjoy colonisation for about 25-40 years until we also get tired of their stories. If anyone does not think this is serious please go study a map and look at the strategic location of Libya.
American has already appointed an envoy to Benghazi so it doesn’t matter how long the civil war will be on. Benghazi will be peaceful and they shall build military bases there and prepare for the Ugandan Invasion.
Now look at Tullow oil in today newspaper (Thursday) that doesn’t want to pay tax, takes you to court and then says they are doing you a favour even to pay the little tax that they have paid. And mark you; they are being helped by your black brothers and sisters. Exactly how colonisation was in the first place.

Sunday 21 August 2011

Two years later, victims of illegal killings still wait to hear the voice of justice


Demonstrators take cover as a soldier shoots in the air after the Kasubi tombs fire two years ago

Rights violations. At least 100 people were killed under unclear circumstances by security operatives but no perpetrator has been arrested or implicated in the shootings.

Kampala. Two years have gone by but 100 families whose relatives were killed under unclear circumstances at the hands of security operatives are still to receive justice.
Despite documentation of these incidences, the most recent highlighted in the US State Department’s Human Rights Report on Uganda 2010, has made human rights activists conclude that a culture of impunity is pervading justice in the country.
In her April 2011 report on human rights practices in Uganda, US Secretary of State Hillary Clinton detailed the killings of up to 100 civilians at the hands of state agents the past two years alone, before noting that there was little evidence to show that perpetrators were punished. The report also documents killings in several parts of the country, where some suspects were either tortured in custody or shot to death by security agencies.
In September 2009, at least 40 unarmed protesters and bystanders were killed when security forces used live bullets to disperse people who were protesting government’s refusal to allow the Kabaka travel to Kayunga District for a youth day celebration.
No accountability
No one has been held accountable for the killings, despite several commitments from the government, a botched attempt by the 8th Parliament to institute an inquiry and a flood of complaints from families of victims.
This incident, the most cited evidence activists are using to accuse President Museveni’s administration of human rights violations, is one of several cases showing government’s failure to punish perpetrators.
Numerous reports have been issued by watchdog agencies both local and international implicating security operatives of the Uganda Police and the UPDF, in alleged indiscriminately killing of civilians.
The US report also profiled the March 14 Kasubi Tombs shooting, when Special Forces Group of Mr Museveni’s advance team, fired into a crowd that had gathered to commiserate over a fire that had gutted the Buganda Kingdom royal tombs a day earlier. Cornelius Kayanja, Haruna Kakumba and an unidentified person were killed during the clashes.
A government commission, which probed the cause of the fire, concluded inquiry four months ago and authored a report, although its findings are yet to be made public. But after the shootings, the army said the President’s bodyguards were provoked. More than a year later, no arrests have been made.
Mr Med Kaggwa, chairman of Uganda Human Rights Commission, argued that it would be wrong “to take one or two or three cases” of rights violations to conclude that there was a culture of impunity. However, Mr Ssewanyana told this newspaper that the gusto with which the government “dragged” to court protesters of the opposition-led April walk-to-work protests, including FDC leader Kizza Besigye, while no security operative implicated in the Kasubi or Kayunga killings has been charged, was evidence to show “a lack of political will to bring to book perpetrators of abuse.”

http://www.monitor.co.ug/News/National/-/688334/1222522/-/bjwv7iz/-/index.html

Monday 15 August 2011

Give oil money to Ugandans in cash, say US researchers

Alan Gelb, a Researcher  at the Centre for Global Development says: ‘Oil rents, if unchecked, could simply turn into additional sources of patronage to perpetuate the (NRM) regime’
Alan Gelb, a Researcher at the Centre for Global Development says: ‘Oil rents, if unchecked, could simply turn into additional sources of patronage to perpetuate the (NRM) regime’ 

Government should distribute expected oil revenue to citizens through direct cash transfers but tax the stipend, a US think tank has suggested. “Redistributing oil rents to Ugandan citizens and forcing the government to rely on taxes — both corporate and personal income taxes, ties the fortune of government revenue to the broader welfare of the Ugandan economy,” argues the Centre for Global Development.
It says Uganda’s preference to invest petro-dollars into infrastructure could spur economic development, but weak institutional capacity and political patronage will likely result in skewed domestic choices and corruption.
Corruption/kick backs
“Construction as a sector is notoriously susceptible to corruption, increasing the likelihood that programmes will be promoted for their expected kickbacks rather than their effectiveness,” wrote senior fellow Alan Gelb and Research assistant Stephanie Majerowicz.
They added: “Countries that start off from weak institutional capacity and poor governance prior to the discovery of oil or large mineral resources are likely to fall victim to the curse. Oil revenues are likely to exacerbate these institutional weaknesses, leading to greater corruption and poor overall governance….
“Oil rents, if unchecked, could simply turn into additional sources of patronage to perpetuate the (NRM) regime.” President Museveni has articulated that oil money will finance development of road, rail and electricity infrastructure - but not subsidising consumption. His views find home in Uganda’s new National Oil and Gas Policy which assigns the expected windfall to; bankroll new economic and social infrastructure, increase power-generating capacity and enhance energy security through localised oil production and processing.
Neither Energy Minister Irene Muloni nor her Information counterpart, Ms Mary Karooro Okurut, was available to say if government would accommodate the latest proposal. The confirmation of about 2.5
billion barrels of oil reserves in the Albertine region drives Uganda to maximise internal revenue generation but fears linger over the possibility that the windfall might be siphoned by bureaucrats for self-enrichment.
Pricing subsidy or equal electronic oil cash transfers through communities or directly to individuals’ bank accounts (as done in Iran) would flatten income disproportions and scale up private enterprise for wealth creation, argue the American scholars.
They propose the scheme could extend each individual some modest $50 (Shs132,000), or even $25 (Shs66,000), annually. Already Uganda is in final stages of piloting a social protection scheme, probably beginning early next month, where each citizen above 65 years and orphaned family heads gets Shs22, 000 monthly - an equivalent Shs733 daily pay-out.
Critics of oil cash transfers say imperfect citizenship documentation in Uganda makes sorting of genuine beneficiaries difficult and handouts engender citizens’ dependence on the state yet if broken infrastructure is not fixed, movement of skilled labour and market access for farmers remain constrained.
The Centre for Global Development says the cash distribution scheme provides incentives for informal workers presently outside the tax system to register to receive their cash transfers, expanding government’s tax base. “The experience of other countries suggests that oil revenue, if not distributed, will further reduce political will to improve the tax system.”

Resource curse
According to the report authors, perception that the poor are not well-informed and are likely to misuse state stipend is “paternalistic” because the scheme has facilitated labour migration/job searches; improved health, lowered the burden of child welfare and reduced household poverty in countries where it has succeeded.
The report titled, Oil for Uganda – or Ugandans? Can cash transfers prevent the resource curse?, says a section of Ugandan elites find the scheme unpalatable because they want to “be able to use the patronage from oil rents to cling onto power.”

http://www.monitor.co.ug/News/National/-/688334/1219012/-/bkenssz/-/index.html

Friday 12 August 2011

Clashes in Masaka walk-to-work plans as Besigye rules out taking more actions


CLOSE WATCH: Police officers trail Dr Besigye and Mr Mafabi’s cars in Masaka yesterday. PHOTO BY JOSEPH
 Police yesterday afternoon opened fire and unleashed teargas to disperse a huge crowd of civilians gathered in Masaka town to see opposition politicians launch a second round of protests against the rising cost living.
Mourning the dead
Riot and regular police had unsuccessfully failed to prevent the surging masses from gaining entry into the stadium at Kasana, Nyendo Ssenyange Division of the municipality where Forum for Democratic Change leader Kizza Besigye addressed them.
But as Dr Besigye, joined by scores of people, left the stadium in a procession towards the Total filling station near where two-year-old Julian Nalwanga was shot dead during the April walk-to-work protests, the police swung into action near Leo Junior School.
Teargas canisters were lobbed into the crowd as the police beat up people indiscriminately. Other security personnel opened automatic rifle fire. Dr Besigye was forced to abandon his plans as the evening drew on and police and other operatives dressed in military uniform remained adamant in stopping any further activities from taking place. At about 7.30pm, Dr Besigye set off for Kampala, with police patrol vehicles and a holding van on his tracks.
At the rally organised by Masaka Municipality MP Mathias Mpuuga under the Activists 4 Change (A4C) pressure group, Dr Besigye was joined by Leader of the Opposition in Parliament Nandala Mafabi and other politicians. He told the crowd “they have been telling you Besigye is using you when for him he is rich. Yes, I am rich and my father was rich. My problem is stealing and you will not find stolen money on my bank account.”
‘Paranoia in NRM’
Dr Besigye chided the ruling NRM party for what he said was its paranoia over the people’s protests and applauded Masaka community for being brave.
“When I visited you at election time I was not joking when I said I will be based here to liberate the country. I am now back to inform you that after mourning our colleagues who died and those who lost their dear ones, we have to start again,” he said.
He said people
have been asking him to use the gun to overthrow Museveni but he has told them the gun will not cause the desired change. “We could get the guns, and we know how to use them, but if we do that then we will need to use the guns to keep ourselves in power,” Dr Besigye said.
The opposition leader drew the crowd’s attention to President Museveni’s recent comments when he visited Rwanda that Uganda is full of thieves. “Of course, there are so many thieves surrounding him.
They not only steal money, they also steal votes. We told them that if in the last election they cheated we would never go to the courts again. We said we would bring the case before the whole lot of you, the 34 million citizens of Uganda. And it is that effort that we are here to launch today. Whatever A4C leaders tell us to do from today we shall do.”
He ridiculed the purchase of fighter jets, saying even Egypt’s Hosni Mubarak had hundreds of jets but failed to use them.
http://www.monitor.co.ug/News/National/-/688334/1217108/-/bkg1oez/-/index.html

Price protesters are terrorists, says government

Kampala
Hours after a second round of protests against the rising cost of living was launched, the government on Wednesday reportedly labelled sections of the opposition as terrorists.
And yesterday, the country’s leadership promised to take stern action against anyone breaking the law under the guise of exercising the right to demonstrate over the current economic crisis. But Opposition leaders quickly responded and denied that they are plotting mass insurrection as alleged by the government, and said they will not be intimidated.
Grand plan?
They also promised to continue their protests until the authorities address the problems facing Ugandans. Security Minister Muruli Mukasa told reporters during a mid-morning briefing in Kampala that the opposition is pursuing a grand plan of inciting the public to rise against the ruling NRM government, a claim Opposition lawmakers who talked to Daily Monitor described as “empty talk”. “Nobody is going to intimidate us. What the government needs to do is to address the problems facing our economy and stop the blame game,” Shadow Attorney General Abdul Katuntu said.

“There is nobody preparing Ugandans for an uprising, but if [current] conditions prevail the people will stand up. It’s up to the government to make sure that such conditions don’t prevail. Those people in government must address the problems in the country, ensure that there is democracy, stop mismanagement of public funds and promote good governance,” he said.
The security minister’s warning came 24 hours after a Cabinet meeting on Wednesday reportedly resolved that “government associates Besigye, his people and their actions as terrorists”, according to sources who attended the meeting.
Cabinet also reportedly agreed to launch a nationwide campaign to sensitise the masses about what is going on with the economy to counter what they called the “lies” being spread by opposition leader Kizza Besigye. “We also agreed that all people involved in such actions be arrested and jailed,” Daily Monitor sources said of the Wednesday meeting.
Mr Mukasa said the opposition is portraying the government as illegitimate, claiming the NRM rigged the February 18 general elections, and as such is opportunistically pressing for power-sharing. “The opposition is hoodwinking the public to believe that [their] agitation is in public interest and that the government is insensitive to the public concerns.
They are doing this by mobilising demonstrations around genuine issues of public concern such as increased fuel and commodity prices, demand for salary increments, power blackouts and high tariffs etc,” Mr Mukasa said.
Psychological preparation
Without providing specific evidence, the minister said the opposition, using social media networks like twitter, facebook and YouTube is psychologically preparing the masses, especially the youth, for armed insurrection.
This claim, however, flies in the face of Dr Besigye’s repetition of his earlier rejection of taking up arms against the government when he addressed a rally in Masaka on the same day Cabinet met to discuss the resumption of protests against the rising cost of living.
The minister also suggested that, through its political actions, the opposition is disrupting the economy by paralysing trade and tourism, scaring away investors, discouraging remittances by Ugandans working abroad, paralysing social service delivery and threatening the oil and gas industry. The government has also accused the opposition of provoking security agencies and portraying the government as brutal in its action against demonstrations by citizens.
In reference to the Light-a-Candle Campaign initiated by the opposition to commemorate the death of 10 Ugandans shot and killed by the police and other security personnel during the April walk-to-work protests, Mr Mukasa said: “Current intelligence reports show that those opportunistic elements have launched phase II of their disruptive activities starting with Masaka and later spreading to other areas, including Kampala, Jinja, Mbale and Kasese.” “Government will not hesitate to take stern action against anyone who breaks law under the guise of the right to demonstrate.”
Shadow Internal Affairs Minister Hussein Kyanjo asked his counterpart to go slow and reiterated that the opposition will not be threatened by government statements. “We have a duty to represent the views of our people. We cannot sit back when the rest of Ugandans are sleeping on empty stomachs.
When those in government disagreed with those who were government of the time, they chose to go to the bush [in 1980], our option is the streets. The public discontent means there is a problem. The problem is the economy but those in government think the problem is the opposition which is wrong.”
Right to demonstrate
While the government has vowed to crackdown on demonstrators, Articles 29 and 43 of the Constitution explicitly grant citizens the right to demonstrate among other freedoms also enshrined under the Universal Declaration of Human Rights.

http://www.monitor.co.ug/News/National/-/688334/1217486/-/bkfy50z/-/index.html

Friday 5 August 2011

1,800 youth turn up for army recruitment

Youth undergo a fitness drill  during the recruitment exercise in Wakiso District yesterday.
Youth undergo a fitness drill during the recruitment exercise in Wakiso District yesterday.
 PHOTO BY JOSEPH KIGGUNDU  

At least 1,800 youth yesterday turned up for recruitment into the army on the first day of the exercise that will take two weeks. The exercise started yesterday in Wakiso, Kisoro, Kabale, Yumbe and Arua districts.
According to military officials, the army wants 3,000 recruits and 300 cadet officers. In Kabale and Kisoro districts, more than 900 youth turned up for the exercise at Kabale Stadium. But the army only wants 75 recruits and cadets from the two districts.
The Operations and Training Officer of the Mbarara-based UPDF 2nd Division, Col. Godfrey Golooba, said they want 580 recruits and 58 cadets from western region which has over 10 districts.
Creating jobs
The 2nd Division spokesman, Capt. Robert Kamara, said the objective of the recruitment is to create jobs for the educated youth. “At the end of the recruitment exercise, about 600 youth shall get employment. This is one of the reasons why we are carrying out this exercise,” he said.
The spokesman of the recruitment in greater Kampala, Capt. Tabaro Kiconco, said 560 youth turned up at Wakiso District playground. The number is expected to rise to 1,000 by Friday when the exercise ends. However, only 320 positions for both recruits and cadets are available.
The Commander of the Reserve Forces in greater Kampala, Col. Eric Mukasa, who is heading the recruitment exercise, attributed the big turn up to unemployment among the youth. “They see this as a job opportunity. But we shall choose those we want. We are taking only those between 18 and 25 years old,” he said.
Some of those who turned up were eliminated because of forged academic papers, age and failing medical tests. Col. Mukasa said engineers, doctors and lawyers have an advantage over other professionals. “As UPDF, we are lacking in some areas and that’s why we may allow doctors and engineers who are 30 years to join as cadets,” he said.
Capt. Tabaro Kiconco, said the exercise will be conducted at Kololo Airstrip in Kampala on August 6 to 8. Kampala has the highest number of vacancies-15 cadets and 150 recruits. Capt. Tabaro said the district and regional quotas are allocated depending on the number of people in the area.
“We divide the number of people in the country by the number of people in the district and multiply by the required number of recruits,” he said. In Arua District, 320 turned up but only 51 are needed. The exercise involves screening for HIV/Aids, hepatitis, sickle cells and sense of hearing, sight, touch, mental and physical fitness.
http://www.monitor.co.ug/News/National/-/688334/1213242/-/bkis39z/-/index.html

Police detain Kawempe mayor

Police arresting Farouk Kalyoowa one of the demonstrators who had turned at a rally called by Munyagwa. Photo by Abou Kisige.
Police arresting Farouk Kalyoowa one of the demonstrators who had turned at a rally called by Munyagwa. Photo by Abou Kisige

Kawempe Municipality mayor Mubarak Munyagwa has been arrested as he addressed a gathering at the Municipality offices in Kawempe a Kampala suburb.

This after Munyagwa had declared a sit down strike with councilors starting today.

The mayor and the councilors had resolved to strike accusing Kampala City Council Authority (KCCA) of failing to release funds to run the Municipality activities.

Police fired tear gas and live bullets to disperse the gathering that was threatening to cause havoc.

Munyagwa was arrested by the regional Police commander for Kampala metropolitan north, Mike Mugabi.

He is currently detained at Kawempe Police Station.

http://www.newvision.co.ug/D/8/13/761761#

Sunday 31 July 2011

Power slipping away from Museveni in NRM

Parliament rebels, Muhoozi not in control of army, no bail law for opponents
Prime Minister Amama Mbabazi usually prefers to be the perfect picture of calm even at his most harassed moments.
So a few eyebrows went up when the dapper NRM-strongman, on the afternoon of July 21, hurriedly walked into parliament with his sharp black suit and blue necktie flying.

Mbabazi, who is the Leader of Government Business in parliament, the Secretary General of NRM, and a canny operator, appears to have been in a rush to bolster a push by his deputy, Gen. Moses Ali and the Minister of State for Finance Aston Kajara to get the additional funding for the ministry of Energy. But he was too late.
All he could do was to ask parliament to defer debate on a government request for a Shs 61.3 billion cheque to pay subsidy arrears to thermo electricity producers who weeks earlier had cut supply and plunged the country into darkness and possible economic ruin.
Mbabazi’s next target became clear soon enough; new-controversial kid in the House, Muhammad Nsereko (Kampala Central). Nsereko had just tabled his first successful motion on the floor of Parliament - to set up a committee to investigate alleged misconduct in the Energy ministry.
“What is going on?” Mbabazi asked as soon as he bumped into Nsereko in the corridor.
It was a loaded and desperate query. Mbabazi and Nsereko have clashed before over election campaign finances and ministerial jobs. But Mbabazi, the Government Chief Whip, John Nasasira, and the NRM party boss, President Yoweri Museveni, are desperate about Nsereko for more pertinent reasons. He is ahead of a new pack of MPs who have so far made a habit of killing off party moves in parliament with friendly fire.
Despite belonging to the same NRM party, new MPs like Nsereko who are out to make an early mark, are not making it easy for Mbabazi to herd them into one sub-servile rubber-stamp of Museveni’s whims.
Almost immediately the new parliament was sworn in, Nsereko put Museveni on notice to expect opposition by openly criticising Mbabazi’s appointment as Prime Minister, saying it was a bad signal in the war against corruption since Mbabazi had faced corruption accusations.
In another unprecedented move, the Parliamentary Appointments Committee chaired by Speaker Rebecca Kadaga and dominated by NRM MPs, soon followed up by rejecting five of Museveni’s ministerial appointments.
But the biggest blow to Museveni so far has come from NRM women MPs, a corner from which Museveni traditionally expected no problems. Trouble erupted over the election of chairperson of the influential Uganda Women Parliamentarians Association (UWOPA).
President Museveni and his wife, Janet Museveni reportedly favoured Ibanda District woman MP, Margaret Kiboijana for the slot. However, their plans were scuttled when, during their NRM primaries, women MPs instead voted for Sheema District Woman MP, Rosemary Nyakikongoro. She won by a few votes in a tight race. Although she is NRM-leaning, Nyakikongoro is officially an independent MP. So her win angered the true-blood NRM. In anger, on voting day July 8, many of these NRM women voted for the opposition UPC candidate, Betty Amongi.
Since then, NRM insiders fear that the next victim of the NRM chopping squad could be Nasasira. Some ruling party MPs are questioning how Museveni appointed the Kazo MP to head the NRM Caucus. They argue that according to the party constitution, the holder of the post is supposed to be voted for by the caucus.
Nasasira is the third NRM Chief whip to chair the NRM MPs Caucus. All previous holders of the position were never challenged despite being Museveni appointees.
Anger against Nasasira has erupted over the so-called `Code of Conduct’ for the MPs that he is expected to release soon. The code of conduct is apparently designed to ensure that MPs toe the party line but some MPs appear determined to oppose it and debate and vote in what they are calling “public interest”.
“We shall wait and see what the code says,” one of the MPs said, “Nasasira should expect ‘opposition if it is obnoxious.”
“Nasasira lacks legitimacy as leader of the caucus,” another NRM MP who requested anonymity for fear of reprimand said, “but he can regain it by conducting the caucus business according to acceptable rules.”
She predicted that Nasasira would fail if he resorts to threats to push positions members feel are unpopular.
Trouble ahead
The omens do not look good for President Museveni. Observers say Museveni could resort to other means, including using the army, to cling to power if he fails to get his way with crucial legislation in Parliament. But this choice is being imposed on him when he is 67 and frail.
Although his son, Col. Muhoozi Kainerugaba, has a firm foothold in the army, he is not yet entrenched enough to guarantee that the armed forces remain loyal to Museveni in times of crisis. It is partly for this reason that the President’s younger brother, Gen. Caleb Akandwanaho aka Salim Saleh is currently schmoozing with ex-servicemen in northern and West Nile regions. His modus operandi is to ensure their loyalty to Museveni.
Museveni also wants to use the law to gain a firmer grip on opposition politicians. That is why he is anxious to push through parliament an unpopular law scrapping bail for suspects accused of ‘economic sabotage’. Although he had mooted it in the past, the President reignited his demand for bail for some suspects to be scrapped when the FDC President, Col. Dr Kizza Besigye, led massive `Walk-to-Work’ protests in the city early this year. The law is, therefore, designed to ensure that suspects arrested in such protests are locked away for at least six months.
A committee of NRM lawyers under Prime Minister Mbabazi has already been set up to ‘study the legal issues around this proposal and come up with a legally tenable proposal’. The other offences for which Museveni wants no bail include murder, rape and treason. But it has been opposed even within the NRM camp. Even Maj. Gen. Jim Muhwezi, one of the very few Museveni generation bush war colleagues still surviving in parliament, says the proposal to ban bail for some offenses is fraught with complications. “It would defeat the end of justice and presumption of innocence,” he told The Independent, “Innocent people will be incarcerated for a minimum of six months just on the basis of mere suspicion. Even its framers could fall victim at some point.”
But Muhwezi is not one of the MPs Museveni is most worried about at the moment. The President’s biggest concern, says Makerere University political historian Mwambutsya Ndebesa, are the new MPs ‘who for various reasons may want to do things differently’.
President Museveni has, until now, played the numbers game in parliament. But his camp is now dominated by these new MPs whose loyalty to him is not guaranteed. Insiders say he is frantically fighting to get as many of them as possible firmly into his camp.
Museveni dangles money again
A rubber-stamp NRM Caucus is crucial for Museveni because over the past 25 years, he has relied on different sets of people to extract favourable resolutions from parliament and other organs of state. Observers say the challenge he now faces is to rely on people in their 30s, which is three generations away from his bush war colleagues, and without historical debts and gratitude to Museveni.
Therefore, although, on paper, Museveni has the numbers to pass any Bill in parliament, the election of opposition UPC MP Betty Amongi to the UWOPA chair on July 8 showed that the NRM cannot count on how the new breed of mavericks in its ranks would vote.
Amongi’s UPC has only four female MPs in the House, but she beat the candidate of the powerful NRM which has 97 female MPs because they were not united. It could happen on any vote. That explains Museveni’s determination to beat the new NRM MPs into line.
Observers say it’s this anxiety that has led to the numerous NRM caucus meetings in State House and agricultural modernisation tours in which President Museveni has schmoozed with MPs and ‘sized them up’ with the view to stamping his authority.
Apart from hosting the MPs to nominate the NRM’s candidates for Speaker and Deputy Speaker just over two months ago, the President still found it necessary to host them again for three days beginning on July 17, first at his country home in Rwakitura for an ‘agricultural modernisation tour’  and later for a closed door meeting at State House Entebbe.
As they toured farms in Masaka, Mbarara and Kiruhura districts, many easily figured out that their host’s cardinal preoccupation was not modernisation of agriculture.
“Although the President showed willingness to listen to the different views, he seemed most interested in unifying the party position in parliament,” an MP on the tours told The Independent.
President Museveni was widely criticised in December last year when the government gave MPs Shs 20 million each to purportedly monitor National Agriculture Advisory Services (NAADS) projects in their constituencies. Some opposition MPs labelled the money a `bribe’ for passing the unpopular traditional leaders Bill and rejected it.
There is now word of the President `facilitating’ the new MPs to set up model farms and monitor agricultural projects in their constituency.
“We can’t modernise agriculture without money (and) the president knows it,” one of the MPs who are looking at the money in it told The Independent.
Dangling money at MPs to get his way has in the past worked for the President. This time, however, the numbers are tighter and the stakes higher.
“Museveni has increasingly hinged his influence on offering money and jobs but the MPs know he currently does not have enough,” says Makerere University political science professor Aaron Mukwaya.
Another Makerere University professor, Yasin Olum, agrees that given that the NRM is not as popular as it was in the past, especially due to the current economic woes, “some of its MPs may not be willing to blindly peg their political destinies to those of the party whatever happens”.
New power centres
The situation today is a broader replay of Museveni’s struggle to maintain party unity after Col. Kizza Besigye broke ranks and penned the controversial missive entitled: ‘An Insider’s View of how the NRM Lost the Broad Base’ in 1999.
Besigye, who was then a serving army officer and had been deeply involved in the politics of the Movement, named individuals Museveni had used to ‘manipulate’ the Constituent Assembly to achieve his ends.
He referred to a meeting between Museveni and his confidants at his farm in Kisozi in Gomba district, where he said a plan to pass Museveni’s views through the CA was hatched. Those in attendance, Besigye said, were “H.E. the President (Chair), Eriya Kategaya, Bidandi Ssali, Steven Chebrot, Agard Didi, George Kanyeihamba. Miria Matembe, Mathias Ngobi, Mike Sebalu, Lt Noble Mayombo, Jotham Tumwesigye, Aziz Kasujja, Beatrice Lagada, Faith Mwonda and Margaret Zziwa.”
Of all these, only Kategaya is in the 9th Parliament, but as an ex-official member without voting powers on key issues like whether to lift bail on some offenses. Kategaya, who wielded immense power at the time, does not seem to have any significant influence over the new NRM MPs. Museveni faces the same fate unless he can turn the tide. His waning clout was felt when his nominees were thrown out and others humiliated.
Kategaya, Janet Museveni, and another long-serving Museveni ally in cabinet, Henry Muganwa Kajura, were thoroughly humiliated during the vetting.
Janet Museveni, 63, was asked if she is not ashamed to be minister in a family-affair cabinet led by her husband. “You are greedy!” the Leader of Opposition, Nathan Nandala Mafabi, snapped at her.
New Masaka municipality MP, Mathias Mpuuga, 36, fired a similar volley at 77-year old Kajura. Mpuuga first said he was just three years old when Kajura was governor of Bank of Uganda in 1978.
Then Mpuuga taunted the elder: “Are you not ashamed that I’m now the one interviewing you to be a minister? Does this country owe you a living?”
The same committee kicked out Kabula MP James Kakooza, who in 2003 led the campaign to amend the constitution to remove term limits on the presidency so that Museveni could run again and again. Kakooza’s rejection is significant because he had been successfully vetted by the more malleable 8th parliament.
Some observers have said, the current disunity in NRM is a result of an increasing tendency within the NRM for ‘various centres of power’ to emerge over every issue as they position themselves for the battle for power in a post-Museveni era.
One MP, who was elected on independent ticket but attended the recent caucus, told The Independent that these ‘centres of power were very active’ in the last campaigns and in some cases supported candidates who eventually won.
“They would like to see reform in the party,” the MP says, “but they don’t want to say so publicly.”
The MP said some of the new MPs and even others who made it back to thThe MP said some of the new MPs and even others who made it back to the House were denied official NRM party funding but still won, a situation that has made them ‘reconsider their priorities’.
Prof. Olum agrees that as Museveni ‘grows frustrated’ that the transforma­tion he hoped to cause in Uganda does not seem to be happening yet he is grow­ing older and ‘increasingly losing control over matters of state and the party’, some of the new party members may want to avoid the criticism the last parliament faced and chart a new direction for the party.
But Museveni still has one vital tool; cabi­net jobs, for beating errant NRM MPs into the party line. When Museveni named his new cabinet recently, he deliberately left one ministerial post (State for East African Affairs) vacant. Prof. Mwambutsya says this was designed to keep MPs who were left out of cabinet hoping that any time they could be appointed to cabinet. If true, parliament’s rejection of four of his nomi­nees strengthened Museveni’s hand. He now has five ministerial jobs to dangle at MPs.
But buying peace with ministerial appointments might prove a nasty boo­by trap for Museveni, according to Prof. Olum. He says the appointment of Henry Banyenzaki, formerly a ‘rebel’ MP, into cabinet, for example, could provide impe­tus for more, not less, intra-party criticism within the NRM.
“It could also send the signal that oppos­ing the party from within pays,” says Olum.
That could explain why, despite their sometimes very public spats, Prime Minis­ter Mbabazi is courting the new kid in the House, Mohammed Nsereko. President Museveni might, in a desperate move to buy party unity, give Nsereko or any other NRM rebel, a ministerial job.

http://www.independent.co.ug/cover-story/4437?task=view