Pages

Monday 21 November 2011

Museveni can avoid going like Gadaffi


American group shows how torturing Besigye could affect the President
At 25 years in power, Yoweri Museveni is the fifth longest president in Africa and pressure is mounting on him to quit.
In the latest salvo, a November 11 report by an American democracy analysis group, the African Centre for Strategic and International Studies (ACSS), criticises Museveni and other leaders who stay too long in power.
An article titled “Africa and the Arab Spring” in the report, A New Era of Democratic Expectations” the report warns that leaders who stay too long in power like Museveni “are likely to depart on terms considerably less favorable to themselves”.
The Arab spring - a wave of demonstrations and protests began on Dec. 18 2010 when young Tunisian Mohamed Bouazizi, set fire on himself in protest after police confiscated the fruit and vegetables he was selling from a street stall – have since seen the presidents of Ivory Coast, Tunisia, Egypt, and Libya, toppled.

Tunisia’s Ben Ali who had ruled his country for 23 years fled into exile; Egypt’s Hussein Mubarak is being prosecuted; and Libya’s Col. Muammar Gadaffi, who had ruled the country for 42 years, was killed by a mob in the street.
“The issues motivating public anger in the Arab world — restricted civil liberties, corruption, widening disparities in wealth, lack of dignity, police impunity, and sham elections — echo loudly in Africa,” the report says.
President Museveni has repeatedly said that what happened in Libya cannot happen in Uganda.
But the report warns that, “It would be dangerous for Museveni to infer from [any] structural differences that the risk of a Tunisia-like civil insurrection is impossible in Uganda….Persistent protests in Tunisia and Egypt began almost five years ago — and see where they ended.”
Opposition FDC Publicity Secretary, Wafula Oguttu, says Museveni might end up like Gadaffi or Mubarak.
“Ugandans will not sit back and watch one man drive the country to destruction,” he said.
Wafula added that Museveni is likely to stand again in 2016 for another five-year term. If that happens, then Museveni could easily become Africa’s longest serving president.
Museveni’s options
A fundamental question raised by the report is how other leaders like Museveni, who have stayed in power for long, are likely to end?
“Historically, autocratic leaders that proactively led the process of transition to democracy, fared considerably better than those that waited for the forces of change to overwhelm them,” the report says.
Authoritarian regimes that transitioned under pressure were unable to protect the institutional interests of their parties and the military.
“Instead they were more likely to be prosecuted for corruption or forced into exile,” the report says.
The report shows how semi-authoritarian leaders could conceivably lead transitions to democracy and win competitive elections like Jerry Rawlings did in Ghana. It says long-serving presidents like Museveni are “in a unique place to champion the creation of genuinely democratic institutions that they could leave as a legacy upon their departure from power”.
The analysts have developed a democratic trajectory basing on eight political, social, and economic indicators on whether a country moved to or away from democracy. The more positive the indicators, the more likely a country’s leader would end well.
President Museveni, for example, has only two positive indicators out of nine. He is rated well on economic growth and internet use.
He scores very badly on years in power and control of corruption and is only average on oppression of civil society and development progress, oil management and inflation.
By comparison, Rwanda’s Paul Kagame performs very badly on years in power, and suppression of civil society and the media, and control of inflation, and is average on internet use. He scores highly on economic growth, development progress, control of corruption, and lacking the threat of oil. Although the indicators are descriptive rather than predictive, basing on them, Kagame’s end is likely to be better than Museveni’s.
The report is based on research that covered about 50 African countries to analyse what it called the “big man syndrome” and rank countries on the extent to which they are democratising. Museveni’s regime is categorised as semi-autocratic, Kagame’s as autocratic, Kenya as a democratising regime and Ghana as a consolidating democracy.
In the non-democratic states, which are about 40 percent, the rulers depend on mineral wealth, politicise army and police, and personality-based government that refuse to share power.
“This neo-patrimonial model has ingrained the belief that politics is a winner-take-all endeavour,” the report says.
Effect of protests
“The Arab Spring is instigating changes in expectations that African citizens have of their governments,” the report says, “There is a palpable sense that African citizens will no longer passively sit back and accept abuses of power.”
It notes that there have been protests in more than a dozen African capitals, including Kampala, demanding greater political pluralism, transparency, and accountability following the launch of the Arab Spring.
It describes the large protests that erupted when television footage of the violent arrest of opposition leader, Kizza Besigye, was captured by Ugandan media and how broadcasters were forced to stop live coverage of the protests.
“More than anything Besigye could have said or done, the images capturing the government’s heavy-handed response badly damaged the legitimacy of the Museveni regime, both domestically and internationally,” the report says.
It commends Uganda’s parliament for its aggressive oversight role of the executive branch by subpoenaing government officials and documents, to review oil contracts that have been shrouded in secrecy and forcing ministers to step aside over corruption.
Uganda is listed among countries that could easily shift from semi-autocracy to democracy because of the growing assertiveness of its parliament, media, and local government structures.
“However, the decision by Yoweri Museveni to push forward with another term in March 2011, 25 years into his leadership tenure, as well as the expectation of new oil revenues in the near future is a counterweight to these democratic tendencies,” the report says.
“Uganda’s heavy-handed response to the service delivery protests organised by opposition politician Kizza Besigye did more to undermine the legitimacy of the government than the controversial 2011 presidential elections themselves,” the report says.
In a dramatic twist, the FDC says that in a bid to completely obliterate the opposition, the government has hatched plans to assassinate Besigye and other opposition leaders. The government has denied the allegations as “absurd and ridiculous”.
To promote positive regime change, the report recommends support for regional integration, planned transitions, rewarding positive leaders, and sanctioning regimes that use force against peaceful protesters.
“Such tools should target not only political leaders but also high-level military and police officers who enforce violent crackdowns against citizens expressing their rights to free speech,” it says.
It recommends that donors align aid with democratic practices to avoid the dilemma the United States and other leading donors currently face vis-a-vis their support for semi-authoritarian Ethiopia, Rwanda, and Uganda.
Already donors, under budgetary constraints themselves, have been cutting aid or putting African governments on notice for government repression and ongoing corruption in several countries, including Uganda.
The demand for democracy is propelled by expanding access to information, education, urbanisation, youthful populations, and the growing awareness of governance norms elsewhere.
The report comes just days after the US Department of State, which is the equivalent of the ministry of Foreign Affairs, on Nov. 2 issued a statement condemning Museveni’s failure to respect the freedoms of expression, assembly, and the media.
Earlier on Nov. 1, the London-based human rights group, Amnesty International, had issued a scathing indictment of the Museveni regime. The report described harassment and imprisonment of journalisms, torturing of opposition politicians, and denying protesters opportunity to assemble and express themselves.
Effect on economy
It pointed at widespread impunity of the security forces, killing of civilians, and detention of peaceful protesters on charges of treason.
The report notes that since 2000, autocratic governments in Africa have typically generated economic performance that is 40 percent slower than that of democracies.
According to the report slow growth removes a key pillar in rationalising autocratic governance — that they are more effective (what some have called “performance legitimacy”) and provide greater stability at the early stages of the development process.
“The longer leaders stay in power, the more likely their populations bear the cost,” it adds.
As a result of this growing unease of the populations and loss of support from key constituents for regime leaders, like the security, will drive forces of change against these regimes.
Uganda has a history of changing power violently. In 1966, the country’s first president, Sir Fredrick Mutesa II was ousted and exiled after a violent attack on the Buganda monarch. Milton Obote who ousted Mutesa was himself toppled in a coup in 1971, to return in 1980 and be overthrown in another military coup in July 1985. To become president, Museveni fought a bitter five-year guerrilla war that claimed thousands of lives.
Museveni is Africa’s fifth longest serving after Cameroon’s Paul Biya who has spent 28 years in power. Teodoro Obiang, of Equatorial Guinea is the longest serving followed by Angola’s Jose Edurdo dos Santos and Zimbabwe’s 87 year old Robert Mugabe who have ruled their countries for 32 years.
Besigye says Museveni does not have a succession plan.
“He cannot imagine himself out of power,” Besigye told The Independent. If President Museveni, under whose regime Uganda has witnessed unprecedented economic growth, presides over a peaceful transfer of power, he will have added another milestone.

Someone wants to kill me



Until May 23, Prof. Gilbert Balibaseka Bukenya was Uganda’s vice president. He spoke to The Independent about life after leaving the office he held for nine years.
Did your appointment as vice president the first time come as a surprise to you or did you expect it?
GB: No.  It was a surprise but I had anticipated it. You know I was a very junior member of the NRM party. I am not one of these people they call historical except that I was born in Kakiri and I always tell people to call me historical because the people of Kakiri were very crucial in starting the NRA war and I look after over 700 skulls of people that perished in the war. Anyway, I could see the president had tested me on many grounds to see whether I was suitable. I had noticed that especially when I was his minister of presidency.
Did the president call or consult you that he intended to make you vice president?
[Laughs] We discussed I think eight months before the appointment and we went through a lot of discussions. He would look at an issue and tell me I am preparing you for this. He even took a lot of my medical tests and he eventually rang me.  The president is a very interesting human being.
In the same breath did you discuss your removal from office?
[Silence then somber mood] No, he didn’t.  That upset me a bit because a day before the NRM members of parliament meeting, his secretary rang me and told me tomorrow the president is not nominating you and I said thank you very much. I knew he was telling me your time is over.
Were you disappointed at the manner of transmission of the message or were you disappointed that you had lost the position?
I had thought about this for nearly nine months.  I was not disappointed for losing the position but in the manner the message was transmitted - through a mere secretary yet we have been colleagues. I was expecting him to at least ring me and openly say “Bukenya thank you very much for working with me. I am sorry but I think it is time for a change” and I would have said thank you very much for giving me the opportunity to serve.  We eventually talked after I had been removed from office and we are moving on well.
Did you have in mind any people who would have replaced you as vice president in the event you were taken out of the position?
No. I never thought about it but certainly the current vice president was a very strong contender he had performed very well in parliament, supported the NRM positions and for me I was very pleased.
The President appointed Amama Mbabazi as prime minister but he also retains his position as NRM party secretary general.  Do you think the choice of prime minister was right? And do you think the prime minister should be secretary general of the party?
I think his appointment as prime minister is good. This man has been around with the President since 1974 so it is his time. He has learnt and has experience. He must know the operation of government since he has been with the president and knows the president.  We had a lot of discussion about the position of Secretary General. In one meeting it was agreed by CEC and NEC that a Secretary General should be allowed to work as Secretary General without participating in government. It was adopted. I don’t know why there is this silence about it now. I am no longer a member of CEC. I don’t want to dig deeper whether CEC has already discussed that. But I remember at that time even the president was interested in that separation. May be they have changed.
Your Excellency soon as you were relieved of your duties, the next thing was prosecution relating to management of funds during the organization of CHOGM.  Do you think that this prosecution is correct or indeed fair?
I was very surprised. I think it was hurriedly done. I don’t know whether the IGG wanted to show that he is now trying to catch the big fish because I don’t think it was done in fair way. I was chairman of the subcommittee who did not have any time to discuss or be involved in procurement. I never bought cars; the money came from the ministry of Finance to the central ministry of Foreign Affairs and it went straight to the relevant ministries to discuss how items would be procured. My job was simple; to guide this country on the way we were to run CHOGM. We would look at the money available and say because we have this amount of money we cannot buy 144 cars but we can hire them from those who have the cars and after using them, send them out. That was a policy issue.  Because the case is under courts of law I can’t discuss much about it. But I am very worried about the way things are turning out. For the last two months we have been asking the prosecutor to give us the file of what they are accusing us of so that we can ably defend ourselves. No single file has been given to us up today even when the magistrate said they should give us the files. I am getting worried not because of the case but the things that are beginning to take place in this case and also my life. I am a bit worried now about my life.
Could you be more elaborate and specific on that because this is a matter in court but you are raising an important matter of personal safety?
I don’t know whether there is another motive besides the case. I don’t know whether there is another person behind the case who wants to prolong my agony. There have been situations of associating me with political opposition and political people who are doing wrong to the government. When I was in court I was given bail and I was told to pay a bond of Shs 50 million cash. There are stupid allegations that this money was given to me by Kizza Besigye. It worries me because it is ISO (Internal Security Organisation) generated. That’s tainting my name because Dr. Besigye never gave me the money.
Are you friends with Dr. Kizza Besigye, do you meet often?
I have never met Besigye since 1999. That was the time he had this paper he was publishing complaining about the Movement. I am the one who passed this paper to the president and I subsequently called the caucus to discuss it. That was the only time I met Dr Besigye.  So I am worried about those things which are originating from ISO.
Why do you believe this is originating from ISO?
That is what I have been told. There is also another rumour that Bukenya is associating with underground movements against government and that he is mobilizing some people to cause commotion. They have been trying to search for my old friends. They have taken one lady to Serena and intimidated her to say that she was my secretary for CHOGM and that therefore she knows everything. That is absolute rubbish. They have intimidated her to say she has seen Bukenya talking to army people especially the Baganda officers; persuading her to give evidence. These are things that some people would be tried for treason.
Do you know if she was cooperative with them?
She was not. They attempted to give her money which she refused. I am worried about her because they may kill her.
Did she report these happenings to you?
Yes.
So she is the source of your information?
She is just one source. There are other sources. I am bringing this out because I left Uganda during Amin’s time as there were unnecessary killings of human beings, unnecessary intimidation, false allegations about people which would lead to death of some people. Now I am fearful of this beginning to happen in our country. I am worried of people who try to bring false accusations about others to bring them down. I don’t think we should again have other extrajudicial processes that President Museveni has fought so hard to get rid of.
This is a very serious allegation that you are making. Do you know  any persons that might be behind them?
I don’t know. That’s why I am in confusion. The president of the country stands up and says Bukenya is not guilty of the CHOGM cases citing his consultation with the Attorney General. And then there is insistence in spite of the fountain of honour saying so. This is not the first time the president is saying so. I remember during the Temangalo issue, the president said Hon. Mbabazi is not guilty. All he can do is apologize and the matter is closed. This one has refused to come to a close. What is inside it? So I am beginning to fear.
The Independent is reliably informed that the Attorney General and Vice President Edward Ssekandi were directed by the President to meet IGG Raphael Baku to drop the charges against you following a legal opinion by the AG that the case against you had no legal ground but the IGG  did not honour the directive and slapped more charges against you.  What would you describe the behavior of Mr. Baku as?
It is surprising because every country has the fountain of honour and whether the judiciary goes ahead to prosecute, the fountain of honour will one day exercise his prerogative of mercy. That is why I am worried and asking what’s happening. Where really is the problem? When I hear operatives intimidating people to testify against me I get worried. When my lawyers ask for files to build their defence, and they can’t get them, what is happening? That’s why I fear even for my life. But I have always said Bukenya will die in Uganda. I will not go back in exile. One person even called me anonymously and said “we shall put holes in your body”. That makes me fear that my life is in danger.
Did you advise this lady to report the matter to police?
We are doing that.
Have you reported what you call threats to your personal security to the police?
I am studying them quietly first.
The president has said in the NRM caucus that you are not guilty of the offences you are being accused of. Would you and your legal team consider calling him to testify in court?
I don’t think that it is necessary. I have instructed my lawyers to technically continue representing me in the case. If it is necessary, let’s see action. I am not frightened to go to a court of law because I am not guilty. I am appealing for judicial freedom.
You have an election petition in the High Court whose judgment has been postponed. Are you confident you will win this case?
I can’t be confident. But I have been to court and seen how that judge has been conducting court during the hearings and I think the judge is independent. Whatever decision he will make independently, without anybody ringing him, I will accept.
Looking back, in your years of service  to this nation, what would you say I wish I hadn’t done that or I wish I had done this?
I wish could have put in more effort in trying to really remove poverty. I came out of a very poor family to become a very rich man and I hate poverty. But I don’t think I have done enough. Towards my removal as vice president I was beginning on a new programme of millennium villages, a new concept of building so that people live together, have piped water, a good sewer system, and then they go out into their gardens to dig just like it is being done everywhere in the world. I wish I had started on that three years earlier.
Any regrets?
I socialize a lot. I enjoy life. As I do this some small people have taken advantage of that. Let me finally say I have not risen and coming down as one newspaper said. The rise and fall of Bukenya is not yet. I am still rising because political rising is not associated with political appointments. My fall from vice presidency was a fall from a political appointment. My fall from political function as a member of parliament is not yet even if the judge says otherwise in the election petition. I would still go and contest in Busiro North and defeat anyone who will stand against me.
In your political life are there people you wish you could say to, I am sorry I wronged you?
None. I have not been stepping on anybody’s toes.
Are there those you would wish they looked you in the eye and said ,sorry I wronged you Bukenya?
The ones who went and told President Museveni in my presence a lie; that I was mobilizing to overthrow the president. That man and woman will die guilty of a very big offence. If these came and said forget it I would be the happiest man in the world.
Are  you comfortable naming them?
They will know themselves if they read your paper.

http://www.independent.co.ug/cover-story/4749-someone-wants-to-kill-me-part-ii

Can Museven defend all his company members





Defending the Prime Minister may have left Museveni with a narrowing circle of allies. Is he worth it?
NRM members unhappy with the way their chairman and secretary general are running the party voice one common grudge: their “leader is surrounded”.
Ruling party members say that President Yoweri Museveni is increasingly listening to only one voice - that of Prime Minister Amama Mbabazi.
Ironically, as anti-Mbabazi voices grow in number and pitch, his star seems only to rise. Reports last week that the President had ceded to him powers over all the Ministers in his [President’s] office – on top of his control of most government activity as Leader of Government Business – indicate a precedent that gives Mbabazi more muscle than any of his predecessors under the current regime.
For whatever reasons the President trusts Mbabazi – whether it’s because he’s strong, weak, smart, organised, sober, whatever - it should be natural that a head of state would step up to defend a man who is such a vital part of his operation, especially if he feels he’s being unfairly accused.

But the President’s protection of his Prime Minister has not come without a price. Many trusted allies – within and outside Parliament - appear to have retreated from the “inner circle”, reluctant to work with Mbabazi. As demonstrated over recent weeks, many party members – especially in Parliament – do not want to listen to him. It may be only a matter of time before such disaffection percolates into the lower ranks of the party. Some say the President is stubbornly alienating the party for Mbabazi’s sake and that in the not-too-far future, he may find the price to this sacrifice to be too high for the prize.
Among the disenchanted, The Independent has learnt, is the President’s brother, bush-war hero Gen. Caleb Akandwanaho aka Salim Saleh, who many see as a galvanising factor within the ruling party.
As a former Minister of State for Microfinance (2006- 2009) , former Army Commander (1987-89), Member of Parliament, businessman, and more importantly as the President’s brother, Saleh is said to have a substantial appeal in the NRM - among its historical and latter-day members,  its civilian and armed cadres, its radicals and ‘rebels’, alike. Until recently, he was also reported to have the President’s ear.
Sources say Saleh had been gearing up for a return to cabinet in May, but changed his mind when he learned that Mbabazi would be heading that team as prime minister. Saleh reportedly protested to his brother - in Mbabazi’s presence - that his choice of prime minister had proved divisive in the party and his becoming premier would worsen conflicts at a time when the NRM needed consolidation.
Museveni refused to reconsider, it is said. Saleh withdrew his interest in cabinet, and returned to his Garuga home, where he spends most of his time overseeing his businesses - including farming interests in Nakaseke and Arua. That is also where he sits to proclaim he has no interest in the on-going shenanigans in the NRM.
Saleh’s disengagement might be a relief to Museveni compared to the more vindictive paths other NRM members have taken. Sources have told The Independent that even out of the ubiquitous eye of the cameras in Parliament, party members in the army had become more outspoken, making a habit of talking to Museveni about the danger of his overstaying in power, arguing for the need to organise an orderly transition. The President reportedly got tired of that talk and ordered them to stop it.
A spoke in the wheel
At the recent Kyankwanzi retreat, when some MPs walked out on the President Museveni as he attempted to hand running of the show over to Mbabazi, Kampala Central’s Muhammad Nsereko engaged his party chairman in a bitter altercation.
The last time a similar confrontation was reported was in 2003, when former Local Government Minister, now PPP President Jaberi Bidandi Ssali, opposed the lifting of presidential term limits.
At the time, Museveni reportedly asked one of his king-pin ministers; “Who are you? You are just a spoke in the wheel. You can go.” Which he did. When the next cabinet reshuffle was announced, Bidandi and like-minded ministers including Museveni’s childhood friend Eriya Kategaya, Miria Matembe and Sarah Kiyingi, had been thrown out.
Perhaps wary of a similar fall-out, most other historical allies of the President have kept their peace as the drama in Parliament has unfolded.
Sources say that some of them – now in Mbabazi’s shadow - are understood to have sponsored ‘rebel’ MPs, whom they keep urging to pressure the party leadership to reform, or more precisely, to throw out the prime minister.
Reasons for hating Mbabazi appear to be as many as the diversity of NRM’s membership, but one oft-quoted has been his tendency to actively alienate others from the President.
In an interview with The Independent a month ago, former vice president Gilbert Bukenya said a “senior leader of the NRM told the president a lie” that Bukenya was mobilising his own support to become president. That “senior leader”, The Independent has established, was Mbabazi. Bukenya said that despite his efforts to correct the impression, Museveni seemed to have believed “the lie” because he minimised contact with his deputy from that time, later dumping him and setting after him the dogs of the IGG’s office.
Even after leaving vice president’s office, sources say Mbabazi has continued to witch-hunt Bukenya, and his indictment before the Anti Corruption Court was understood to be the handiwork of the prime minister. Museveni’s protestations that Bukenya had no case to answer even as the trial proceeded appear to suggest that the President was helpless in the matter.
As helpless as he appears to be in his defence of the Prime Minister? The irony of the President’s defence of Mbabazi is that while it shows the Prime Minister’s clout as growing, it depicts the President’s as somewhat diminishing. Not only because he has had such a hard time shoring up the support of his own party, his cajoling and threatening apparently not as effective as it used to be, but also because the dissenters appear to be too many and diverse, and too invested to back off.
But the President is also keenly invested in protecting Mbabazi. When opposition MPs chorused “Temangalo”- in reference to the controversial land deal in which the Prime Minister sold land to the National Social Security Fund at Shs 11 billion - as they heckled Mbabazi during Museveni’s State of the Nation Address in June, Museveni defended the Prime Minister. He argued that his man was not corrupt, and stories were being made up by his detractors. “If any of you had lasted as long as he has lasted, that would be a good achievement,” he told them, a veiled reference to a history in the NRM of many opposition MPs.
Counter-accusing a whole range of detractors appears to have become Museveni’s default defence of the Prime Minister:
“Baryomunsi is fighting Mbabazi’s wife, while Niwagaba is fighting battles on behalf of Father Gaetano [Tibayenda] against Hope Mwesigye [former Agriculture Minister and sister-in-law to Mbabazi, [MP] Sekikubo is fighting Foreign Affairs Minister Sam Kutesa...,” the President reportedly  told the NRM Caucus at the retreat in Kyankwanzi.
Following the port-retreat confusion in Parliament - during which NRM members were unable or unwilling to withdraw the resolution demanding that the prime minister and ministers Sam Kuteesa and Hillary Onek step aside to allow an investigation of the oil contract affairs, including allegations that they had taken oil bribes - the President attempted to mend fences between the Speaker of Parliament Rebecca Kadaga and Mbabazi. Summoning the duo to State House, where Museveni made no secret of his intention to stick with Mbabazi and not ask him to step aside. Not much is known of the details of that discussion, but Kadaga, who was still awaiting a presidential response to the resolution, returned to parliament appearing to have washed her hands of the resolution and all that it represented.
While an ad hoc parliamentary committee, chaired by former Minister of state for Transport and chairperson of the Natural Resources Committee, Michael Werikhe, has been appointed to investigate the allegations, not much confidence is invested in its outcomes.
“The findings of the investigation have already been predetermined [in Mbabazi’s favour],” said the dispirited Lwemiyaga County MP Theodore Sekikubo, who was a lead petitioner in the recall of parliament for the special sitting. Part of the pessimism is because aside its chair – a former minister who some fear may use the committee to climb back into his cushy cabinet post - the  seven-member committee also has Mbabazi’s ally and mentee Steven Tashobya and three unknowns. The two rays of hope, opposition politicians Hussein Kyanjo and Cecilia Ogwal, may find themselves outnumbered and outmanoeuvred.
Lone disciple?
NRM’s vice chairman for Eastern Uganda and Soroti Municipality MP, Mike Mukula, says that in the course of his long 25-year rule, Museveni has realised that not many people can agree with him all the time, which explains his “deep attachment to Mbabazi”.
Mukula said it is unfortunate that the public has a different perception and great dislike for a man that the president has immense faith in.
Over the past quarter century, Museveni has showed himself to treasure loyalty as much as he loathes challenge.
When a retired army captain, Ruhinda Maguru, declared his ambition to challenge Museveni for the leadership of the NRM in the run-up to the 2011 election, the NRM’s vetting committee, under Mbabazi’s stewardship, ignored him and declared Museveni unchallenged. Maguru threatened court action in vain.
A similar fate befell Dokolo County MP, Felix Okot-Ogong, who is believed to have lost his place in cabinet as State Minister for Youth and Child Affairs because he declared a desire – however unlikely - to succeed Museveni.
Another former minister and bush war fighter, Col. Tom Butime, lost his Mwenge North constituency in the last election because, observers say, he rejected a post as state minister for Karamoja Affairs in 2006, which he saw as a demotion, coming down from a full Minister-ship of Internal Affairs.
Butime was lambasted by the army and defence spokesperson Lt. Col. Felix Kulaigye for “insubordination”. The moment the commander-in-chief deploys a soldier, argued Kulaigye, the soldier must comply without questions.
What Mbabazi has, that others lack, observers say, is a keen understanding of what his boss wants. “Mbabazi always positions himself as seeking to work for the president, not to be president,” an NRM insider said.
By declaring war against the dissenting MPs, Museveni may be taking on virtually everyone who matters within the NRM, except Mbabazi. This is especially as, at an age just shy of seventy, they don’t take seriously his threats to return to the bush against them, or to rule forever. Moreover, some MPs like Kampala Central’s Nsereko may be encouraged by the fact that even NRM voters in their constituencies want to see reforms in the party.
That Mbabazi is Museveni’s closest ally in government is instructive. The Kinkinzi West MP has attributes Museveni is always happy to publicly celebrate – loyal, hardworking, sober; with no time to spend in bars and other social places where he might spill state or party secrets. Mbabazi reinforces this image. One of his favourise retorts are; “I have a lot of work to do”.
Ironically, it is for these qualities that many of Mbabazi’s detractors do not want him in charge, as they perceive him to look down upon the mass, grass-root origins of the party in the jungles of Luwero, on which they rely for their political strength.
Bush-war base
While Mbabazi was an active player in the liberation war, he worked far from the jungles, in the external wing, helping to mobilise resources and support for the war effort. On taking power in 1986, he served as Director General of the External Security Organization (ESO) until 1991, participated in writing the 1995 Constitution, and started his ascent through different ministerial portfolios to become premier.
It is a tribute to his discipline that as Museveni’s view of many of his colleagues has waned over the years, his view of Mbabazi has only improved.
Of the 41 Ministers Museveni named to his first cabinet in 1986, only five remain –Ruhakana Rugunda, Kahinda Otafiire, Crispus Kiyonga, Moses Ali and Eriya Kategaya. Although at senior cabinet level, none of them remains as influential in government as Mbabazi.
During the bush war, there was always friction between the field combatants and members of the external wing, but special dislike seems to have been reserved for Mbabazi.
Maj. Gen. Pecos Kutesa, in a 2006 book titled “Uganda’s Revolution 1979-1986: How I saw it” even questions Mbabazi’s bush-was credentials. Kutesa narrates a visit to Nairobi for the 1985 peace talks, during which he was astounded by Mbabazi’s lifestyle.
“I looked at Mbabazi wearing an expensive suit and driving a posh car and wondered whether we were fighting the same war,” wrote Kutesa.
But Mbabazi’s penchant for sharp suits and posh cars, in Museveni’s view, is a lesser evil compared to the drinking and womanising of many of the other cadres.
When Maj. Gen. Kahinda Otafiire and former Vice President Gilbert Bukenya challenged Mbabazi for the party’s secretary general-ship, Museveni remarked to NRM members that they needed a secretary general who wouldn’t drink and spill party secrets in bars.
When Kizza Besigye first challenged Museveni in 2001, Mbabazi famously declared that Besigye had “jumped the queue”. While some NRM leaders say they may consider running for president when Museveni retires, Mbabazi says he has no presidential ambition and he will retire when Museveni retires. Museveni may not believe him, but he is happy that Mbabazi is sending a good example to quell ambition in the party.
Observers expect Museveni to stick with Mbabazi because he seems unable to spot cadres who suit his approach. The rare competition to Mbabazi, paradoxically despite his love for the bottle, was Brig. Noble Mayombo, who unfortunately died young. Like Mbabazi, insiders say Museveni treasured Mayombo for his combination of hard work and constructive – but cautious - advice, given with due care not to push his boss’ positions too much.
Another cadre groomed in the stable of the NRM, whom Museveni once considered a viable successor in the party, observers say, was former Army Commander Maj. Gen. Mugisha Muntu, who unfortunately defected to the opposition FDC, where he is now organising secretary, along with his former bush war colleague and Museveni’s former doctor, Kizza Besigye.
Muntu says there is a problem with Museveni’s management style. “When a leader prefers control to delegation of powers,” says Muntu, “that is how things end up [in failure to trust the people the works with].”
Muntu says his former boss had fallen out with a lot of people over time and if he lost the loyalty of “those few he has identified he knows his position will probably be much more threatened than it is already”.
Muntu, who is said to have declined a cabinet posting on quitting the army in 1998, says he is now most concerned with how Uganda will be managed after Museveni. This echoes Besigye’s stand. The FDC leader insists on “walking to work”, a move widely seen as meant to mobilise civil disobedience against Museveni.
Besigye had been critical of Museveni’s rule as early as the Constituent Assembly when he represented the army, but it was his damning 1999 dossier, “An Insider’s view of how the Movement lost the broad base” that broke the proverbial camel’s back.
Besigye depicted his boss as a manipulator, fixated on staying in power against all odds. Referring to a letter Museveni wrote to a group of CA delegates, Besigye showed that Museveni urged them to retain the Movement System as opposed to reintroducing the multiparty system since it was a convenient vehicle to retain power.
And retaining power is what Mbabazi seems to help Museveni do. Makerere University political scientist, Yasin Olum, thinks there must be something beyond just trusting Mbabazi that others don’t see. Otherwise, wonders Olum, “why would Museveni put his career on the line because of him?”
The answer for the above question may elude us for now, but political historians cannot believe their luck. Documenting how an ageing president who shot to power with revolutionary ideas and a “broad based” government, dealt with a stumbling economy and a god-sent oil find, amidst deepening opposition and a thinning coterie of friends and allies, is the stuff that future careers will be made of.

Profile of Parlaiment’s investigators
Speaker of Parliament, Rebecca Kadaga, on Oct.27 institutes an ad hoc committee to investigate the allegations of corruption, bribery and other wrongdoing, involved in the management of the initial stage of Uganda’s oil. Key of these allegations is that three ministers – Prime Minister Amama Mbabazi, Foreign Affairs Minister Sam Kutesa and former Minister of Energy (now Minister of Internal Affairs) Hillary Onek – had eaten bribes from the oil company Tullow Oil, to favour its concession to exploit Uganda’s oil. While President Museveni appears to have ignored a Parliamentary resolution asking the ministers to step aside and allow an investigation, Parliament’s committee will proceed. However, given the frantic political lobbying, including a week-long NRM retreat that followed the resolution, and the fact that the senior ministers are in position to influence the work of the committee, many advocates have lost any faith that the committee could produce valid outcomes. But objective observers might want to give the committee the benefit of a doubt:
Michael Werikhe Kafabusa
The committee chairman, MP for Bunghoko South, was a state minister for Housing in the previous cabinet till he was dropped from cabinet in the May cabinet reshuffle. Werikhe also served as state minister for Energy for one year from 2005-2006 and before that, state minister for trade in 1999. Critics are concerned that as a staunch NRM cadre with clear ambitions to return to the fold of cabinet – given the amount of trouble he allegedly has been giving Nandala Mafabi in Eastern Uganda – he may use the investigation as an opportunity to win back the favours of the President and his Prime Minister.
He may have the general competence to carry the investigation, having worked as a Social Sciences lecturer in Makerere University and an acting commissioner in the department of physical planning, Ministry of Lands, Housing and Urban Development until 1996, some worry that his political ambitions may over-ride his ethics.
Stephen Tashobya
The MP for Kajara County, Ntungamo district, came to parliament in 2006 on an NRM ticket. Tashobya also chairs the Legal and Parliamentary Affairs committee of Parliament, so his presence on the committee has technical legitimacy. But Tashobya,  a partner with Tashobya, Byarugaba and co. advocates, is seen by some a Mbabazi-lackey. He was reported to have used the NRM’s Kyankwazi retreat to lobby for support for the Prime Minister, convincing with other NRM members to withdraw their consent on the resolutions once they returned to Parliament. Many see his presence on the committee as intended solely to defeat its very purpose.
Hussein Kyanjo
The Makindye East Member of Parliament, also leader of the Justice Forum (JEEMA) party is one of only two opposition MPs on the committee. He has reportedly already been to Dubai, Malta and the UK, investigating the documents that allegedly implicate the ministers in corruption. He can also quite ably carry his own in a hostile committee, and supporters of the resolution will hope that he does.
Bigirwa Julius Junjura
The MP for Buhaguzi County, Junjura is a member of the natural resources and budget committees of Parliament and a member of the NRM Party. He’s largely an unknown quantity, but to observer, his party affiliation pre-determines where his loyalties will lie.
Cecilia Ogwal
The MP for Dokolo County is the other opposition voice on the committee. Formerly known as the Iron Lady of the UPC, the veteran MP crossed to the FDC Party in 2010. Thankfully she did not lose her iron will and supporters of the resolution will hope that she can use it to drive the investigation. Almost an institution unto herself, Ogwal has been a constant staple of Uganda’s Parliament since the Constituent Assembly in the early 1990s. She is currently Uganda’s representative in the Pan-African Parliament in Durban South Africa. She reportedly turned down a ministerial offer by President Museveni. This offers some hope that in addition to her broad experience, the MP has a backbone that can serve her well as she navigates the politics of the committee.
Grace Freedom Kwiyucwincy
The Zombo District Woman representative is an NRM member, but has not yet distinguished herself in Parliament since her term began after the February general elections. A member of the committee on public service and local government, she served for three years as a technical adviser in Ministry of Local Government. Her party leanings might suggest that she pulls for the ministers, but in this day of rebels in the ruling party, it may be best to wait and see.
Joseph Matte
The Bughendera County MP is an NRM-leaning Independent legislator on his second term in Parliament. Pro-resolutionists hope that his poor treatment at the NRM primaries where he lost might help him carry a grudge into the investigation, but observation of ‘formerly NRM’ Independents suggests that their allegiance to the mother party more often than not, tends to win out.

http://www.independent.co.ug/cover-story/4839-isolated